mhb

And what are you going to do with that money?

How do you reconcile that aspiration with lunatics and their regimes that would like to do harm to other countries?

What is shameful about the "military stuff"? Isn't that's what is protecting you from your neighbors and their patron?

> Cancer is best understood as a family of tens of thousands of diseases

There's a site that lists the AWS instance types, so maybe...

I don't need a 13 page pamphlet to convince me that people are motivated by making money. But that's orthogonal to wanting a powerful military under whose umbrella you are pontificating.

If you think suicidal fanatics or megalomaniacal dictators are motivated by sub-optimal resource allocation, you haven't been paying attention.

> “I’m not going to spend my time doing war” (in my case anymore)

It's less convenient to indulge that opinion without the protection of the most powerful military in the world.

Better title: Fn Fn keys

Couldn't resist dragging Israel in, right?

You don't think the US military should have the best technology?

I don't know why you want to argue about this here. Your proposed solution elsewhere of "How about an across the board $1/W hook up fee for new customers?" agrees with what I'm saying about having a neutral policy to handle new customers who impose externalities.

Thanks for sharing. Do you have a name for that feeling?

That clears things up. You want to use the cudgel of the state's power regarding zoning issues to address ventures which you find morally objectionable in some way.

So why doesn't the way New York addresses new aluminum smelter businesses apply to new data centers?

You don't have to guess. That's why he wrote an essay for you.

Not really the point. Should we have separate laws for stealing from grocery stores, electronics stores and drug stores because they have different characteristics?

Other than data centers being the bogeyman du jour, why isn't the bill written more generally to address potential impacts of any large new business that is anticipated to create effects like noise, pollution, infrastructure requirements, etc.

It's not already required for proposed businesses to address these issues?

Power use would be immense and it would be insanely slow.

Also building furniture.

The In-Laws:

Shel: "You robbed the U.S. Mint on your own? The CIA thought it was too crazy?"

Vince: "Too risky."

> Why trust anyone?

Because comparative advantage.

Oh FFS. The difference between polyps very likely becoming cancer and some polyps maybe becoming cancer is not pedantry. And it probably wouldn't be as annoying to you if you just said that you didn't know instead of attempting to dig deeper by providing a source that you either didn't read or didn't understand.

Yes. That is the recommendation because "some" polyps are or may become cancerous. Not because all do. Unless you are saying that they do?

You claimed that "polyp will very likely eventually become cancer". I don't think this is true, in general, for polyps even though some might become cancerous. The paper you provided is pretty dense, but it didn't see to me as though it is saying that polyps generally become cancerous.

> Left alone that polyp will very likely eventually become cancer

I don't think so. You have a reference?

Courtesy of TFA and capitalism:

"In 1985, if you were a reasonably affluent American, the best computer that you could afford was the IBM PC AT. The PC AT would cost you about $6,000—$19,400 in 2026 dollars—and thus represented about a quarter of the median American’s annual income; and it ran on an Intel 80286 processor, capable of something like 900,000 instructions per second. Today, if you find yourself in a market stall in Nairobi or Lagos, you’ll be able to find a cheap smartphone—like the Tecno Spark Go, manufactured by China’s Transsion—for somewhere between $30 and $120. That phone will run on a processor capable of billions of calculations per second."

I want Jetbrains to fly! What settings should I use?

I'll bet they could discover some useful building materials underground. Concrete arches, ladders, water pipes, computer servers...

I don't think the article asserts that the better bird vision is primarily due to the absence of occluding blood vessels, although that is an advantage.

Scientists noted that the bird eye produces good results with a less efficient process. This article is only about the explanation for that. Presumably they would have been just as interested if a human level eye also operated without oxygen.