A slight distinction that might not matter sometimes, but i often wonder how many antibiotics/pain killers I've taken prescribed from urgent cares that were possibly overkill.
454 karma · joined June 24, 2014
A slight distinction that might not matter sometimes, but i often wonder how many antibiotics/pain killers I've taken prescribed from urgent cares that were possibly overkill.
We're also talking two buckets of money. The money coming back in to the US, and the taxes the govt collects. I think this one-time tax money in this case is already spent with these tax cuts?
If I couple this with Warren Buffet recently advising that the Dow will go to 1 million in 100 yrs [0], I can read between the lines (as you always need to with Warren) that big money already knows it can keep its big money for a very long time. Getting value consolidated into a) a few really large companies; in b) preferably the US; c) quickly; seems to be the bet.
I also agree that jobs is the target here. Special dividends and buybacks will be the way to extract this money back to the US economy (unless your a foreign rich investor who already sees this and starts pulling money out of oil and into the US - still a win for the US?). And then we get some more case studies in whether trickle-down works or not. If it does, we've created a (more?) solid small business climate, where theoretically more innovation and growth comes in. (?) If it doesn't, well, we'll continue to see the middle class disappear.
At least that's what i think i see, but who knows on timeline and i'm not a finance guy. All I know is that this current tax plan puts about $60/month back in my pocket using my 2016 numbers, so if i invest that $60 into AAPL i'm most likely going to have more than $60*12 at the end of the year.
[0] https://www.google.com/search?q=buffet+dow+10k - and thats 1000000 in points, not dollars... (!)
https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/disney/images/3/36/John-...
Some things to look for: Across multiple transactions with these [edit: localization] companies, they end up building a database of phrases, of which some companies might try to claim ownership over. Watch out for that when negotiating.
You're also most likely going to pay per word, so if you can figure out a good way to not send them sentences you've already had translated you can save some money.
Its also good to spot check some of the translations. These companies will basically post out the requirements and get freelance translators to do the job (in other words, they're managing all the UpWork work for you so you don't have to). We once caught a translator (NOT of the above-mentioned companies) located somewhere in Europe inserting some choice political statements about a specific biotech/GMO company we had as a client.
(editted for clarity - below the first Paragraph is general knowledge of the industry, not specific to the two aforementioned vendors)
By the second child i was too tired to keep stats, so we winged it and the docs and I happily acknowledge that ignorance is bliss (sarcasm, i think).
At least they have to label it as color added now...
Some other anecdotes:
When my townhome was broken into, I learned that windows are way less secure than smart locks. If someone wants in your home, they're going to get in.
When my house caught on fire, I would have loved to have been able to let the first-responder in remotely as we were an hour away, the fire company was 20 mins, and seconds count.
This seems like its happening at some hedge funds as well for stock picking.
I guess the closed system of the game rules is more manageable than all of medicine, but... I can't agree with "stuck as the current level of expertise".
(see the MIT moral machine)
amazon already built their version of netflix, the only thing they would need to acquire is the original content, and consumers seem to be so fickle over content anyways a licensing deal with the real buyer would be better business strategy. (probably).
I've done something similar to ST out of the same frustrations at work, but my use case was way more specific, and you took it way farther with better execution.
Well as part of my current world, sure I do. I have to satisfy the needs of not just dev, but operations, compliance, security, business, the people overseas that i've never met, etc. What I'd really like to see are startups that bootstrap this stuff to think that way prior to growing.
My original point was that this was cool for the dev crowd and perfect for the blog use case, but "world"-class seems hyperbolic. But if you are working for other people: people walking around who have strung together various automation stacks are a dime a dozen -- I've literally seen 4 different takes this month. Execution matters, and execution for your audience matters more.
>> Tools that scale down can also be world-class
We are of the same opinion. I love me some elegant free solutions, and I need to because then I can judge what I'm buying when I need to buy something.
>>Once you get big and purchasing decisions are made far from the front lines I'd argue it gets harder to really have the best tech.
I guess I see where you could be coming from, but it doesn't HAVE TO be that way does it? Isn't the whole point of work to empower yourself to affect the company decision-making. Failing at doing so is sort of, without offending you, you not doing your job. At least that's how I look at it.
[edit: formatting]
I would like to get some time back this winter and make some inside pieces.. I agree with the pocket screws, but I think I can get around some of that with a joiner. I feel like a joiner and planer are the next tools I will invest in.
>>people want things cheap and nice looking
I agree 1000% but, after the aforementioned fire, I personally have a new perspective. "Collecting" things is way below being able to say I invested in myself/family and built something.
I recently had to buy an entire house's worth of furniture due to a fire. We shopped every store we could find, and apart from any store that sources from the Amish, its all crap. The prices are obscene. We also got to see the innards of the old burned furniture... there's so much chip-board and laminating that I think there must be more plastic/glue than wood fiber. Just like electronics are being designed with obsolescence as a requirement, maybe more so is the furniture in your house...
Its so much more rewarding to build a giant custom table and be able to grunt, "hey look what i did". OR even pick up some older pieces at an estate sale and upcycle with a new varnish or paint and some modifications.
We're basically saying here that $60M (plus the other group) is better spent to see what weights to give to models to see how UBI scales-up rather than spending it to run a full gamut of Test Cases through the models and figuring out which outputs to motivate people to do with the money.
I mean, why are we spending money to figure out what people will spend the money on when we can already envision all the possibilities. Or am i wrong, and no one has modeled this yet??