454 karma · joined June 24, 2014
Its a worthless number, and they should stop trying to manipulate the market. Having a secret measurement formula that works for 70% of the houses but not the other 30% needs to either have a disclaimer that its all fantasy, or just outright be removed. I'm guesstimating those 70/30 numbers, but their site gives some locations 2 stars on their own scale: http://www.zillow.com/zestimate/#acc. If its not 4 stars, then don't publish it.
Maybe around October next year I'll buy a spare freezer and start stocking up.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19151203
http://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2013/Q3/prof-diet-dr...
or, this wraps up some other links and discussion... http://therenegadepharmacist.com/diet-coke-exposed-happens-o...
I think, realistically, the only benefit I maybe missed out on at a more expensive school is that I could have (completely anecdotally) met a larger, richer network. And now, I would be using said contacts in that network to get me better job(s). For example, I've seen perfectly regular people come out of Cornell and they just mint money.
On the other hand, investing in a network doesn't stop at college, so it can be overcome in various ways.
And, putting data in multiple places means extra time and money managing it. Generally.
Did we all see the same picture book growing up? Are most righties drawing it one way and lefties another (to which I would be a counter-example)? the guitar from top-left to bottom-right didn't look wrong at all, but why were most drawing it the other way?
Also, no one drew an electric guitar. Shame on us humans. This is fascinating to me more for the human-view than the ML piece...
In any case, she lost 40% of her party and really did nothing to reach back out to it. And Trump capitalized way back in April on that by planting the seed suggesting himself that Bernie should make the 3rd party run.
I share the sentiment: She lost more than he won.
I've been trying lists with Trello, Alexa, or the ShopRite app because I either forget to print the list, or the printer is out of toner, or I can't read my handwriting because my only free time was 2am and I couldn't see straight anyways. There's no elegant and complete solution out there that works for me yet.
What am i missing?
...maybe a foreign company at this point...
I can tell here what tech I need to focus on for my pet project, which will also improve my hirability looking forward.
2 - https://theintercept.com/2016/09/23/big-players-little-stock...
3 - https://theintercept.com/2016/09/24/naked-shorts-cant-stay-n...
maybe if i save it on Pocket it will bubble it up my recommended list?
This guy doesn't seem too big on reading the fine print: invests in Penny stocks and doesn't realize risk? Invests $100k without finding out details? Doesn't know what preferred shares are? Figured 1:1000 (public deal) and 1:30 / 3:1 (his deal) was exactly the same?
I assume there's more to the story in part 2 which i will wait for, but so far I have no sympathy or lesson-learned to match the title.
a) where the heck is everyone going anyway? Can people simplify their lives by efficiently picking routes - and getting them all done in a chain?
b) If autonomous cars are the future, they eventually get some say in how to efficiently structure roads, right? So, will some AI one day figure out that the greater "hive" will all benefit if every car only makes right-hand turns? And do left hand turns just become illegal?
If I had some unique situation where I wanted money more accessible, I'd forego the 401k and get into an IRA with Vanguard, with one or more index-tracking ETFs (VTI i think?). But, I'd make sure its done every single payday automatically and directly. No stop off at the savings/checking account.
*This is not professional investment advice.
If nothing else, that site made me realize where i stood on the consumer/producer scale, and what i needed to do to feel better about my future.
Say you have Fund A and Fund B set to automatically invest 50/50 your $100 dollar contribution bi-weekly, with a buy commission of $5. You pay buy commissions on fund A and B 4 total times a month, so you've wasted 10% of your monthly investment ability ($200 - $20). In a year that money is $194 at 8%. (This used to be the case with old ShareBuilder/ING/Capital One---not sure about the new-style other brokers)
Consider a monthly payment to Fund A and two weeks later a monthly payment to Fund B. You saved half commission cost of above, and in a year your return is ~$205.
In that role, maybe they make lots of decisions, maybe they write things like "Part Deux", or maybe they stand around an scream a lot. Whatever works; probably a little of all of the above, and a good CEO knows when to use which approach.
At some level they may also report to a board, who helps them, or replaces them, all based on their execution success. And at another level, they report to shareholders who do the same.
I have 2 kids - i have to directly manage a relationship with my wife, with each kid, with both kids, and with my wife and both kids. She has to do the same. I have to indirectly manage a relationship between the two kids, and with the wife and both/each kids.
To do it right would mean breaking up those 10 free hours I might have into each of the above.
[edit: also, is this another "quiet" inversion also? US loses another business for tax purposes?]
>>Does it make sense to buy troubled SolarCity before they go under
From an investment standpoint, I think optimally you let Solar City go into bankruptcy, buy it for pennies on the dollar, and then you cherry pick the components you want and sell off any others that you think you can. Can someone do that as a chair of both though, not sure (i guess so?).
Maybe they didn't do that because they see someone else coming in - a new challenger? Or, he sees long term something that others don't. Or maybe he's just ego-maniacal.