1,257 karma · joined August 29, 2011
As for my comment being “lame discourse”, fair enough, but why does that apply to my comment and not the one I was replying to?
How about this one:
4. Stop artificially restricting the goddamn housing supply and catering NIMBYs, and instead allow housing of reasonable quantity and density to be built.
Most high school students take nothing past algebra and geometry, so what specifically are you complaining about?
As far as I can tell, most adults in the US working in a non-technical field do not understand very basic mathematical concepts like fractions, percentages, or negative numbers, and can’t really follow a line of logical reasoning. It’s definitely an indictment of mathematics education, but I can’t support the conclusion that students should spend less time learning mathematics.
> repetitive and pointless, which was exactly how the rest of HS was to me at that point.
So this wasn’t a complaint specific to math after all?
Allowing alternatives yields zero benefit and causes pointless debates and diffs.
There are many possible bad cases. Possibly much worse than this is that the candidate lowballs themselves. Another bad case is that they price themselves out when they might have been willing to take a lower offer after learning more.
The candidate has just as much uncertainty as the employer. There's no reason the burden should be on the candidate to be the first to name a number.
It's very possible for a candidate to be thinking something like "I'm currently making $200K. I think it's possible I could get $300K, but $250K would probably be acceptable, and I might even settle for a lateral move of $200K if I find the position really appeals to me." What should they say? $300K and possibly price themselves out? $200K and possibly lowball themselves?
And... you approve of this? Or what? What exactly is your message here?
neovim plus a couple extensions plus some Unix command line tools are just so simple and convenient.
But there are many, many people who would never for a second even consider the welfare of homeless people as a factor in any decision they ever make, personal or political.
So for all practical purposes charity is definitely not a universal value.
But do what you describe as “YIMBY absolutists” actually exist? Maybe they do, but from my perspective I don’t really see anyone arguing that everything should be buildable everywhere.
It’s amazing that someone could find this innocuous title and page offensive.
As for linked lists, obviously it's true that the cases where they should be used are much more limited than they used to be. But still, they're a very simple data structure that's easy to reason about and which software engineers are very likely to occasionally encounter in practice. I don't think there's much to be gained by eliminating them from students' education.
Personally I have one person in my contacts who's not in the US. This is someone I communicate with about twice a year, and we do indeed use WhatsApp for that.