Point being: if there's a way to game a system, people will game that system.
5,555 karma · joined August 9, 2010
Point being: if there's a way to game a system, people will game that system.
1. We do not have advanced AI. We have LLMs. They're not intelligent, not creative, and are never going to be. I'm with you on the other things, though.
2. The planet will not be destroyed by anything we do. H. sap. might go extinct along with many, many other species, but give the biospehere a couple of million years and it will all bounce back, sans humans.
I've been living/trialing the path you suggest in your last paragraph for 30 years. Sadly it's not gone viral. AMA. ;)
In addition Skype's ToS granted MS a licence to any and all IP you might discuss during a Skype call.[1] I wonder why no businesses were bothered by that...?
[1] ...decades ago, I don't know how it reads now, can't be arsed to check.
There is no Step 2.
Article claims that Fediverse (Mastodon) engagement is down, when, in fact, the past weeks have seen an increase in both sign-ups and active engagement.
More WebGarden than Blog these days. No trackers. No analytics.
edit: My browser, my rules. Don't like 'em? Feel free to go out of business.
is not the same thing as "We will not scan or read your Gmail messages".
Disclosure: I work on curriculum matters for WeThinkCode_. I like the exercise in the article and I'll be proposing we add it to the Java curriculum. I'd be surprised (and not in a good way) if the majority of our students fail to make it work.
I feel strongly that most of the people who think OOP was bad are people who have only ever experienced C++/C#/Java or some even weaker instantiation of OOP.
What do you suppose you're writing when you implement a (micro)service? It's nothing different than an object -- some implementation whose details you don't need to care about when you use it, which details can be changed at any time without disturbing clients (modulo idiocy), and an interface that you use to communicate with it via messages.
And don't even get me started on the OO vs. Functional nonsense...
Anyone with insight?
[1] Old Slow AIs, aka "companies". http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2019/12/artifici...