4,318 karma · joined December 28, 2010
email: plesiosaurus99@gmail.com
There was a ton of volume in both the futures and the pre-market, but it was still dwarfed by all the activity at and just after the open. Most people just don't want to trade until other people are trading, so there's this sort of feedback loop that drives volume to the open.
In the continuous market time priority rules. If a marketable limit order arrives before a market order, the limit order executes first.
Maybe I don't get the full picture, but it sounds like you have to poll via REST API to query the book? Modern exchanges just give you a feed of updates (adds, deletes, trades), so you don't run into situations like this. You can just check the feed to see what happened.
gcc -nostdlib hello.S -o hello
This example uses the old 32-bit syscall invocation mechanism, which works fine under 64-bit Linux. It might be a useful exercise to try porting this program to the 64-bit syscall convention.What? No. They broke into servers at PR Newswire and Business Wire and used the stolen MNPI to make trades. There is nothing about rogue or lone traders here. This was sophisticated international group of hackers and traders engaged in obviously illegal behavior.
Except he isn't actually quoting from the play because that quote and the whole Alec Baldwin character don't exist in the play. They were added when Mamet converted Glengarry Glen Ross the play into Glengarry Glen Ross the movie. It's a really interesting story, actually.
http://www.avclub.com/article/why-iglengarry-glen-rossi-alec...
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/groupon-tries-to-make-the-sec-ha...
Sadly frozen pork belly futures don't trade anymore and haven't for about 4 years (almost to the day), and the Globex contract was GPB not GBP. But whatever, that sounds like a cool story and you should tell the rest of it :)
https://github.com/cloudflare/zlib/blob/31043308c3d3edfb487d...
It's great material for anyone interested in these types of low level optimizations.
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19957-01/806-3568/ncg_goldberg.ht...
http://www.sec.gov/News/Speech/Detail/Speech/1370541505819
I think it shows that the regulators (at least some of them) do want to have a better understanding of the dynamics of the US equity market, and that they are trying to build the tooling that will give them the right sorts of insights. Berman's suggestion that policy changes ought to be driven by data are, I think, something that most technologists would agree with. For whatever it's worth, Berman also has a physics Ph.D. from Princeton. So if your insinuation is just that the regulators are more lawyer than scientist I don't think that's completely true.
edit: Also wanted to add that there has been a lot written about the flash crash and I think this article is definitely one of the better ones.
They will have to prove that his intent was to use the spoof orders to signal other participants to trade and I'm not sure that is as much of a slam dunk as all these news articles are claiming. I.e. there is no email where he just comes right out and says "these here are the spoof orders meant to move the price etc etc etc."
What he is saying is that the Oct 15th move looks really strange, but not if you actually understand how fixed income market makers are reacting to the Volker rule. Quoting Dimon:
For instance, the total inventory of Treasuries readily available to market-makers today is $1.7 trillion, down from $2.7 trillion at its peak in 2007. Meanwhile, the Treasury market is $12.5 trillion; it was $4.4 trillion in 2007.
What he's saying is that market makers have smaller inventories on absolute terms, and much smaller inventories on relative terms, so when multiple big market participants try to move in the same direction at the same time, there is much less inventory available to soak up demand.
Another point scored for TCP in TCP with an SSL VPN. :-)