3,457 karma · joined November 22, 2019
As you point out, Elon’s stats don’t even pass a cursory snuff test in regards to what he’s trying to imply, but his champions don’t bat an eye.
While it seems you are implying that is not cool, it’s actually unremarkable and common government transparency.
I have always been puzzled by the threads since it’s a mess with a bad UI with bad default locations for the various programs.
Also, American social media companies and all others need far more regulation. But that is really a separate topic.
If russia were to try to buy meta, that deal should be blocked. If china were to try to buy meta that deal should be blocked.
It’s a clear example of how leadership can skew the algorithm to try to influence things.
Now, in twitters case they are wildly obvious about it and everyone is starting to think they’re a joke.
Tik tok isn’t run by a buffoon so anything they do would be far more subtle
Twitter is also showing why these type of companies need far more regulation applied. But that doesn’t mean it’s bad to take other actions in the meantime.
Uncompelling! The particulars matter!
Well tough cookies for me, meta and X are bith restricting my freedom of assembly. Will you go to bat for me?
They’ve imposed arbitrary restrictions on my access to speech simply because I refuse to sign up. And The government is okay with them restricting me from these public squares, outrageous!
Will you be angry on my behalf, like you are with the restriction on tik tok?
If these are truly public squares, it’s outrageous that I need to essentially show ID and give away a ton of rights to X and meta just to access the public square. Why are we not mad about that as well?
I don’t really see why it’s hard to see the reasoning behind the ban even if one disagrees with it.
Take it to an extreme, imagine there were zero American social media companies in our modern world where most people get there news from social media. That obviously would be a huge security risk, having one’s population’s news being controlled exclusively by foreign states.
Isn’t that what the government has been saying?
Is wage the only cause of inflation we care about? Guess so.
The pie did grow, so it’s a benefit to society. It just didn’t grow enough that giving the employees a larger slice didn’t slightly shrink the owner’s pie. However, The owners pie shrunk less than it would have had the pie not grown due to increased efficiency.
I wonder how these studies captures the way the workers have more money that immediately flows back into the economy, benefiting everyone.
If a line of reasoning can equally justify all the people who pushed opioids onto Americans, then it’s not a good one.
And I highly doubt linear algebra is a day to day requirement for a typical worker. Sounds like a case of expecting chauffeurs to know how to build a drive train from scratch.
It seems deye either willfully or negligently ignore their contract they made with sol ark. Or their middle men in other countries did. Deye then punished the end users for deye’s lapses.
Where does solark get blame unless the exclusivity contract is what one objects to.
So many people here were angsty about Covid lockdowns here, but those were nothing compared to in China. Similarly if one doesn’t like the president or an official in the US, one is free to go around denigrating them as much as they please - not a wise choice in China.
One needs to police their own tongue and accept draconian rules.
One is basically gelatinized sugar and the other is pretty healthy. If one’s classification doesn’t easily distinguish those two, that’s absurd.
I.e. Marcus, Amex, citizen access, etc. note those are tied to very reputable businesses too.
Then there’s the hundred or more high yield online banks that are more unknown like live oak bank and others.
Choosing either of those two group to compare to, which since gotta was an unknown online bank seems far more appropriate than a legacy retail bank, and yotta’s interest rate is bad.