Sure, but also could be a human nature desire to spread news. Knowledge is power after all. Furthermore, upper management trusting important news to employees isn't a failure of upper management, but rather, placing trust in employees.
if you enter an entire patient history, it could easily be an identifier of the person whereas Google queries have a smaller max limit number of tokens
Very interesting read. The author’s point about traditional academic conferences not accepting papers for GPT3 seems plausible given that Meta AI Chief Scientist Yann LeCun tweeted about why ChatGPT wasn’t impressive
Yes, but the point is the headline is clickbaity, and for the uninformed masses, it sounds like it's highly likely it's from the lab, when that judgment was made with "low confidence"
there is such a thing as measuring too much, but looking at just "revenue" and watching it go up without understanding why and without looking at peripheral metrics isn't true understanding and leads to suboptimal results. Also, a product manager isn't going to be as data savvy as a data scientist
how in the world do you draw such a conclusion from an otherwise interesting and advancing piece of technology. every tech has drawbacks, we can't hold back as a species just because there are drawbacks. we need to build around them.
In absolute terms, there's no rubbish, but yes, it hasn't peaked. In relative terms, the rubbish is about the same. There are simply way more videos than ever before.
2012 is around when they rolled out personalization of your feed, which drastically increased hours spent on YouTube. So the data shows it was on an upward trajectory since then.
Keep in mind Meta isn't developing just 1 product. The metaverse needs advanced tech for it to be realized. Once one or two companies develop the tech, of course new competitors will come in and possibly do it better. But you still need a pioneering company with vast resources to lead the way. For example, Microsoft developed XMLHttpRequest, which led to Google Maps and many other wonderful modern products/services.
> I am (very slightly) more surprised that they still think Facebook advertising is a good (in the sense of "effective") use of their money, given all that has come out in the last few months about how poorly targeted FB's supposedly targeted advertising is
Would love to learn more about how "poor" this targeted advertising is, considering most SMBs use digital advertising by Google/Facebook to reach the customers they want.
No, that's not the way it works at big companies like AWS, Google, Microsoft (source: me, I've worked at all 3). A large company attracts various types of people. It's not homogeneous like what you describe. Also, there are plenty of opportunities to practice "intrapreneurship" within a large company with lots of resources to impact the world in a positive way.
Airflow can be used to process data that only adds up to 10s or 100s of MBs. In aggregate, a big tech company processes petabytes or exabytes, but remember, technology like Airflow isn't processing all of that simultaneously within one task. So no, I would not characterize Airflow as a solution to just "massive company problems".
It doesn’t “sound like” that, it’s literally what they’re admitting to. Let’s not spin the narrative here on HN that Zoom didn’t admit to their faults.
Yes, but then the disabled individuals would have been mentally traumatized. Companies shouldn't avoid doing things just to avoid negative press. They're providing a service for the people.