mod

I haven't yet. I will in a few days here. I wanted to get some fresh fuel, and I made a trip to town today.

We've got temps in the 20s coming so it'll be a nice test on what to expect for heat levels.

I happen to have a dietz blizzard--someone gave it to me, or maybe it was left on the property I bought. I don't share your opinion of the aesthetics of the thing, but I dusted it off after reading your first article recently.

I share a similar love for lanterns and their light quality, although I've mainly just used gas lanterns with mantles.

I have the original galaxy watch still. I use it almost without ever touching the screen. Two buttons and a crown/dial pretty much make it four buttons, and yeah, I don't have to touch the screen really.

I'm also not a very hardcore watch user, though.

I was sold on the GW because the OS (Tizen) was supposed to be the best one. Everyone hated the google OS, which then in GW4 I think they switched to.

Statistically, if you meet ten people in a bar, how many of them are from the group that is "most likely to be in a bar?"

He'll branch out when he gets a little older.

At young ages, I say give them an old-school Nintendo, or N64 etc. Little/no advertising, monetization of your kid's attention, whatever. If they're not on the web or at school yet, they won't even know they're missing out on more modern systems.

Or some similar setup where there's no online, no monthly charge, no pay-to-win, and instead the child gets to play a carefully crafted game, hopefully an awesome one.

I also think (offline) minecraft is great at that age.

Tangent: Man this landing page is hard to read. For the record, I'm a full stack web programmer.

What the fuck is an island?

"Lazy loading islands" What?

"Components only hydrate when they scroll in to view" WHAT?

"Need interactive UI? Load individual, non-blocking component islands in parallel." WHAAAT!?

"...and live server output (SSR)" SSR = Live Server Output. OOOOOOOkay.

50 acronyms later and I'm way too fatigued to try this shit out.

In the case of fireflies, they lay eggs in leaf litter. So you need some unkempt properties or wild land.

Fellow rider, that's terrifying. I'm trying to even imagine what could happen. I guess at an angle means your rear wheel was coming around, slipping? Maybe the slickness and even your "maintaining speed" amount of throttle was enough to get the rear wheel spinning. That's just especially scary for me, because I really like the--illusion?--that I'm in control. I want a say-so in what happens, especially in risky situations.

I've totaled out a bike myself and gotten back on, but more and more I think maybe it's time to give it up. Especially because I think there's a non-zero (but small) chance we solve aging/death in my lifetime.

What is about 40 to 50% on any given year?

It's unclear to me after reading both the GP and your comment.

Common advice is to find where two of your interests or talents cross. Programming is one here, so now just build something that's useful in another of your hobbies or interests.

Another idea is just cloning an existing idea. I think there are probably many niches where it would be relatively easy to build the best product, and other niches where the number of customers is so large that it's not too difficult to capture a small part of the market, even if it's saturated. 12k/yr is a tiny amount of revenue.

You may have read the comment the way I initially did:

as "Now let us (let's) delete them"

I think his meaning was "give us the right to delete them" which IMO should be the standard.

Are doctor's notes part of this?

I wonder how many doctor's are going to regret some things they wrote.

Also, can't you get more/less difficult puzzles by altering where the clues are, or how many? It would feel like a totally different puzzle.

I do think that my brain may have fabricated that part. It's the fishy part--pun intended.

I have never been picked up again by my scalp, so I think that's decent reason to believe the memory of the physical sensation is pretty accurate.

There's not a lot else to the memory.

I tend to agree, however depending on the size of fish and some other factors, many don't scare off very far. I don't think it's definitive.

(I'm an avid fisherman despite the dock fall!)

I'm not actually familiar with perch as an adult. I last caught one when I was maybe 8 years old. After googling, I believe they were "yellow perch" (caught in northern Indiana)

I don't recall having dreams about it, no.

The perch are one of the only fine details I have, which is interesting. That and the scalp sensation.

I don't remember falling, and I don't remember the aftermath. I'm sure it only lasted a few seconds.

I was genuinely interested, so thanks for the response.

I think a note-taking system would be great for the current version of what you're doing, because it would make the whole thing really easy to grep for keywords.

I kinda wish I had all my really old bookmarks, but as you say--I can find what I want with google.

I always think about one memory I have that might not be true. I was very young--3 years old--and I have relatively vivid (visual) memories. But, it was a life-and-death circumstance, maybe that matters.

I fell off the dock while fishing. My dad was 20 or 30 yards away. I remember being underwater, I remember the water being stained green a bit, I remember seeing fish I was used to catching (perch), and most importantly, I remember how it feels to be lifted up by your scalp. My dad just grabbed my hair in one hand and lifted me straight up out of the water vertically. You would think it hurts, but it doesn't--at least at the weight of a 3 year old.

The event for sure happened, I'm just not convinced I didn't create a specific memory later--maybe when I was 9 or 10.

If anyone is interested in some listening on this topic, Tim Ferris interviewed a guy recently who talked a lot about rapamycin on his podcast.

https://tim.blog/2022/07/27/matt-kaeberlein-life-extension/

There's a transcript linked if you'd rather read/skim it.

After you take the CBD to stop things, what happens?

How many of those bookmarks do you estimate are 404s now?

I can give you a reason:

I want to be able to move cameras inside my business on a whim. The cameras are 99% for monitoring while we're open. They solve many, many mysteries that tend to take place in bars.

I spent a bajillion hours flying helicopters. Really loved 3 & 4.

Haven't played since, though. What happened?

Hi!

Is there a good training ground, like a simulation, for playing around with this stuff?

I agree. I think this publication is a net-loss for the world, for sure. People will find and use this code--people who could/would never create it themselves.

It will be used for many reasons, but the stalking is the most obvious.

Not all of my usernames are as resistant as this one, unfortunately.

Even in the hand, he was laughing while knowing that he lost.

He only freaked out (okay, his eyes did) when he saw her actual hand.

I'm not sure what you mean. She had the best hand at every point, before and after the outrageous call.

The odds were not against her, they were in her favor.

Usually the player who is losing is the one who more strongly prefers to run it more than once. That's just an observation of mine based on watching a lot of hands.

Monetarily, there's no difference whether you run it once or twice. It just lowers variance.

I'm not sure what you're disagreeing with. She literally says it, I'm not reading into anything. What are you taking away from the video? (I genuinely am not sure what your argument is)

> Because that's what she would have had to know, his cards, and the next cards in the deck in order.

She would only have to know that if it was an absolute requirement that she wins the hand.

It's not--she can take a positive expectation, which includes a coin flip, and still be wildly profitable.

The outcome of the last two cards isn't overly important, just the state of the game when she committed $109,000.

> He has more outs

You've made a fundamental error here. He's the only one with outs, as outs refer to cards that will improve your hand to be the winner. She doesn't have outs, because her hand is better than his at every single point.

I think your points are reasonably well thought out, they're just missing some fundamental knowledge required to make any kind of valid determination.