580 karma · joined April 26, 2025
Trump in fact acts contrary to most recommendations from Chicago economists, even though both are “conservative”.
Also does anyone like memcached anymore? When I compared with Redis in the past it appeared more simple.
Yes, I think that’s where the “bait” characterization comes from.
And I agree - it’s questionable how much economic progress has been made in 50 years.
But now to Thiel’s point. Most people don’t actually believe that’s true. They believe in some kind of tech progress narrative so the alarms aren’t going off.
The more radical and disaffected political segments are those that do not believe this. They have a defeatist or at least pessimistic view of future outcomes. So the question is more psychological - what happens when people no longer think the pie is growing? And I think the answer is it’s not pretty.
we have excess but we also have massive inequality. The economic conservative position is literally that this is ok because everyone’s well being is going up at the same time. So what if we stop believing that?
> even in the top 10% of earners, violence is a preposterous idea.
Have you been following the news this last week?
> Seeing my peers excelling whether financially or otherwise is not going to turn me violent.
You’re right. You don’t see yourself in competition with your neighborhood. Try to imagine a situation where you do. What are the most politically gut wrenching topics for you?
In C undefined is used primarily when there is not a reliable and efficient mechanism for detecting a problem is happening. For example a C implementation may check every single invalid pointer deref, but more realistically it only detects only extreme out of range. So it’s undefined what happens.
I think this comment wants to say he’s some form of he’s a racist or authoritarian but in more concealed terms.
Name calling (the lowest form of discourse) is still name calling even when disguised.
> It's theoretically possible that Donald Trump is correct about something
Hmm.
Our political system is built on coalitions fighting for things for their groups: credentials for jobs, taxes for projects, space for their people and families, status in community.
When the supply of those things becomes fixed it’s a zero sum fight for what’s left. You can’t lose without another side winning.
The point is that growth alleviates the bitterness because there is a belief that in the future there will be more and I will have a chance to get what I want. When that belief goes away power is the only game in town - and that tends to manifest as violence.
> and the media has to be unbiased for people to make good decisions
In other words the media holds the power. And we need them to be responsible and not use that power. That’s a fragile system.
Nothing has changed. Few projects start with you knowing all the answers. In the same way AI can help you learn, you can learn from books, colleagues, and trial and error for tasks you do not know.
The pattern I see over and over is a team aimlessly putting a long through tickets in sprints until an engineer who knows how to solve the problem gets it on track personally.
You just had to take the European tour for your health.