3,156 karma · joined April 8, 2015
The very year we declared a trade war with all our friends they stopped coming by to visit!
The only surprising thing here is that anyone is surprised.
No crime was committed The pretext of the stop was a lie The drug dog falsely alerted probably due to manipulation of his training The officer repeatedly lied under oath
It looks like the entire interdiction operation requires that the officer lies at three distinct phases. (The pretext stop, the search, and in court)
Do we want our officers to lie under oath? Providing false testimony to the courts? Falsely accusing innocent people?
Pretty sure the answer is no. Pretty sure the bible has some things to say about Bering false witness or some such.
No, no, and no.
Better question, why are you still on facebook?
Potentially these last two points are related.
The prosecution rests.
Maybe I got lucky. In retrospect I probably got super lucky.
I suppose if you posted a picture of my house and immediately thereafter a picture of yourself with a gun I’d call the police too.
The thing you fail to understand is how afraid of guns British people can be.
There was an article a few years ago about a British man, ex army. The story goes someone threw a bag of shotguns over his fence. He found them. Brought them inside for safekeeping overnight, brought them to the police station first thing in the morning. Arrested and charged for possession.
As far as I can tell he posted a picture containing a gun. This scared someone who reported it. The police arrested him. No further evidence of a crime was found and he was not charged.
He has the launch platform (spacex), he has the existing power and data infrastructure (starlink), he has the demand side. (Xai)
Will he succeed? That is different question. Is it possible to add enough power generation and thermal radiative capacity to starlink nodes to bother? Don’t know, but an analysis that fails to answer those two specific engineering questions is useless.