368 karma · joined April 21, 2014
I read that as poesklap!
Isn't this exactly the problem. Someone else deciding what you are ready or not ready for. For me democracy is about everyone having a voice, even those on the lower levels. There will always be different levels.
I've heard this same argument made using energy instead of mass. That article correlated economic growth with increased energy usage. It does make sense, our universe might be expanding but it is finite.
However, what if this is a social and not a physics problem? Maybe more and more new people are required to keep human social structures functioning optimally. Maybe the solution is virtual reality.
In South-Africa you have to beg private hospitals to admit patients with certain psychiatric conditions. The default is to send patients to public hospitals, and that will likely involve much more restraint and much less care.
My respect goes out to people that keep on trying to deal with these situations with limited resources.
That idea is quite well known, so it's likely that the post was written like that deliberately. I was just wondering if you could create a similar sounding post with a chain of people rewriting the original in their own words.
...Lord have mercy, not another one!
Second that idea. From my perspective, if recycling was perfect the only limitation on single use items would be how convenient it is to dispose and obtain another one. Also, I hate searching for new clothes that fit when the current options go out of fashion.
If you had a container running somewhere in the cloud talking to containers owned by other users then the mobile device doesn't have to be a server?
I load jQuery after Angular. This means Angular is still using jqLite - and prevents the extra functionality from being abused in simpler use-cases.
Sometime in the future browsers will support Object.observe natively. At this point I will scrap my companion directives and use Angular binding even in long lists.