[1] https://textslashplain.com/2017/01/14/the-line-of-death/ (Though I realise after reading this that this concept isn't really all that relevant anymore)
1,317 karma · joined September 8, 2017
[1] https://textslashplain.com/2017/01/14/the-line-of-death/ (Though I realise after reading this that this concept isn't really all that relevant anymore)
Isn't that what the "power settings" do? It's a slider at the bottom right, hidden in a tray icon. Sure, it only has three positions and also influences battery consumption but it pretty much does what you want. (Not sure if windows 11 kept this though)
I'm not that surprised by the findings. Someone has to deal with the generated crap people produce, and usually they don't get to decide.
Pairing is just anti-repair atm.
if you want to know how: put the part ids (which are used for pairing) into the apple id account and verify them when switching on the phone.
The same happens to media sharing via bittorrent in germany right now. Having some site which gets closed instead seems to be preferable to me.
Of course copyright infringement is different from whatever emulators are doing but I imagine the effect might be the same
If their primary objective is to break the CUDA monopoly, they should up their game in software, which means going as far as implementing support for their hardware in the most popular user apps themselves, if necessary. But since they don't seem to want to do that, they should really go for option one, especially if a single engineer already got so far.
Let's say AMD sold a lot of cards with CUDA support. Now nvidia tries to cut them off. What will happen next? A lot of people will replace their cards with nvidia ones. But a lot of the rest will try to make their expensive AMD cards work regardless. And if AMD provides a platform for that, they will get that work for free.
so... you also still have to have another PC and operate apps on it.
First of all, most of the software companies do SaaS, meaning they also provide the service. And then, even if they don't, the users will just hand down the paperwork to the companies developing the software. Because those know what was put in, security and components, and want to have this in legal writing.
Secondly, imagine your average IoT seller. They should not be liable for their bad product because they don't run it themselves? "The user" is liable? In most cases the "user" can't even do anything about their insecure device.
I think developers are rightly responsible here. It's pretty comparable to other industries where the products have to be safe when getting sold, think pharma, food, toys, cars, etcpp.
> Will it actually improve security? I don't think so.
Think B2C. It will improve things there, and massively so. Software in B2B was already somewhat regulated via audits and certifications.
Had the same issues with (self-managed) gitlab CI. This is not jenkins-specific and usually something you can fix much easier in jenkins (other than just retrying)
> oh, we can't replicate that error message from a tool that you have no visibility over, retry and it'll probably work
This could maybe be better in other, more declarative CIs but honestly, its pretty much the same. The only thing some of them have is a local runner.
> oh, we have no idea why something timed out, retry and it will probably work
Jenkins has this, yes. But use another CI with docker and you can get the same and much worse.
But in essence, yes, at our company too, jenkins is a pet. But this means that someone knows it from the inside and outside and knows which things to fix in your pipeline. Good luck with trying to extend gitlab CI (or others) to fix things you need and/or opening an issue with them.
Gitlab has quite some high-profile issues sitting around for years with customer requests piling up. In jenkins, you'll find an extension that will do exactly what you want, or you could roll your own.
Imho regexes are overused for such stuff, precisely because they might do a lot of things you don't think about and are usually a lot slower than manually implementing what you want.
They also can't easily fix the first issue, because they expect their modules to be attached at certain places and the trackpoint should be way up there.
Maybe I'm just prejudiced from my thinkpad keyboards. Haven't used an ergonomic or split keyboard yet, no clue if this would make a difference on how to use a trackpoint.
"All Systems Go! is a conference focused on foundational user-space Linux technologies. Its goal is to provide a gathering place for both contributors and users of projects that make up the foundation of modern Linux systems."
So, summing up: maybe you are not part of the target audience?
I also don't know how certificate pinning is impacted by this (which would mean that simply creating another cert from a EU root cert would at the very least be noticable)