“He is doctor” sounds wrong because there’s rarely just one doctor.
7,699 karma · joined October 31, 2017
“He is doctor” sounds wrong because there’s rarely just one doctor.
You know that humans can lie, right?
But at least with Y2K some effort was made in identifying actual problems. We didn’t just stop using computers because we were too scared of them. This latest round of AI panic is horribly vague and the problems are very poorly articulated.
Cars and guns are two examples where ‘wanton usage’ can (and has) killed millions of people. Obviously they need regulation, but total control, even if it were possible doesn’t strike me as ideal.
Waymo called the cops. It’s not clear if it was the vehicle, or a human in the company. I suspect the latter.
There’s plenty of evidence for unconscious perception.
For mid to large size stars, yes. But Red dwarf stars are expected to live for trillions of years.
The irony is that obsessing over smoothness and frames per second is what causes this in the first place.
They got lucky.
Learning French has been eye opening, in that many grammatical structures that are optional in English are compulsory in French. Abbreviations for example: “it is” or “it’s” are both valid in English, but in French you’re not supposed to say “ce est”, you have to say “c’est”.
Data is a problem. LLMs had the advantage of the whole internet to train on. Robots don’t have that corpus of information. And real time learning seems to be something that everyone in AI is studiously ignoring.
I don’t know why people keep repeating that. Half of gold production is used in industry and for jewellery. And gold has never lost its value the way that some paper currencies have. It’s not like anyone can print gold bars.
Classifying Pluto as a planet is problematic because it lacks the behaviour and characteristics of something that formed according to theories of how planets form. If you tried to describe what a planet should look like based on the nebula hypothesis, you would not be describing Pluto.
Instead it has behaviour and characteristics a lot like the many trans-Neptunian objects, so it makes more sense to classify it that way.
It’s common for surveys to encode various null values. ‘Refused to answer’, ‘Did not know’, ‘Not applicable’, ‘Illegible response’ etc, although there is no standard way to do this.
The SAS language allows you to use multiple custom missing values, but this is not widely known and I’ve never seen anyone do it.