900 karma · joined January 31, 2011
I do not believe that was the only alternative. I have spent a lot of time reading bug reports / feature requests relating to this functionality, and it certainly seems that much of it could be enabled, but apparently never will. The developers seem to think that giving extensions "too much power" would be dangerous, and thus it is best not to let anybody choose power over safety guarantees.
It seems a little too harsh to bring up Linus Torvald's "If you think your users are idiots, only idiots will use it" quote, but it tends to come to my mind whenever I read the abovementioned discussions.
No you cannot. UTF-16 is a variable-length encoding (up to two 16-bit code units per code point).
> I think a lot of people totally discount the enormous cost that Latin-1 users are paying for CJK (etc) support they don’t use.
If we limit ourselves to Latin 1, UTF-16 requires 100% more memory than UTF-8. How often do you need to randomly access a long string anyway?
[1] http://longnow.org/essays/richard-feynman-connection-machine...
What code are you looking at? I see "Microsoft BASIC for 6502 Original Source Code" which runs for 6955 lines. By my reasoning that is more than a hundred pages.
[1] Skunk Works: A Personal Memoir of My Years at Lockheed by Ben R. Rich and Leo Janos (page 101 on my copy)
The relevant Wikipedia article also mentions the system, but in less detail: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_F-117_Nighthawk#Avion...
[1] http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm
[1] https://licensing.fcc.gov/myibfs/download.do?attachment_key=...
[1] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/42343.Blind_Man_s_Bluff
NASA is known to define a set of strict and absolute mission rules before the beginning of a mission for just this reason. See for example the rules defined for various Apollo missions [1]. Note how those rules define all sorts of limits and abort triggering conditions. This is done because there is always a desire accomplish the mission even when something has gone wrong.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reports_of_Streptococcus_mitis...
I doubt an Apollo CSM [1] could support astronauts for a full year (although Mir could [2]). It has proven very handy to have a space station within reach of resupply missions and with enough space to house some gym equipment and a whole bunch of medical equipment. You might also have trouble finding people willing to spend much time beyond the Van Allen radiation belts [3] in an Apollo era space craft [4].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Command/Service_Module
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mir_EO-3 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soyuz_TM-18
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt
[4] https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/stereo/news/stereo_astron...
The letters in question were sent before the first letter was published. How would a copycat know what to emulate before the first letter's publication? It was also found that the latter letters were not very good at copying the original author's style. This is all in the article.
The fuel is also used as a coolant [2] so you would not want to run out of fuel in the plumbing before you run out of propellants in the combustion chamber.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbopump
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merlin_(rocket_engine_family) (search "regeneratively cooled")
The command module did not have a redundant computer or memory, but the lunar module came with a second computer [2] of a different type and running different software.
What you remember is probably the Gemini Guidance Computer's tape drive system, which consisted of three identical tape drives that were connected to the computer through a voter circuity.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Core_rope_memory
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Abort_Guidance_System
[1] http://techreport.com/review/27909/the-ssd-endurance-experim...
Sure, the processor will want to seperate, say, aluminum from iron, and remove any glass from either stream, but I am fairly sure that these tasks become significantly easier if the stream does not also include diapers, orange peels and wet cardboard
How is this supposed to work? Sorting trash into many containers takes me a little more time and effort and pretty much exactly as much energy as putting it all in one place. It also keeps the materials from mixing (that is, becoming dirty). How would it help to first mix it all, compress it together (which is pretty much required to keep transport efficient) and then sort it again?
Even if you want to use a sorting machine, would it not be better to have presorted ("richer", in mining lingo) input material streams?