mtholking

It will be if they release a HTML5 & Google Gears web app competitor to iTunes in addition to embedding the music player in search results.

screenshots of the service: http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/21/google-music-service-th...

We have also had a submission rejected because of content in the application description. Even though the binary submission was not altered, we were forced to re-upload the binary and wait an additional >2 weeks for the next round of review feedback for removing ONE sentence from the description.

There should be a separate review queue for application description, the current system is incredibly inefficient.

here is a much more effective ad on why you shouldn't text while driving

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0LCmStIw9E

A hyper-local politics application.

Allow users to give feedback on every representative, bill, or amendment that affects them from their specific city, county, and state.

Interesting idea, it might help users form an opinion faster by making the rotten tomatoes score more prominent, and perhaps add it to the white space on the right of a title on the home page.

It would be nice to integrate the trailers for the 'Coming out this week' by playing them when the user clicks the large image.

the class references on these two are strikingly similar:

http://www.pushpin.com/api/1.3/docs/

http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/reference.htm...

I think it is thriving because is simple and transparent. Users dont have to learn how to use a new application if they don't need the advanced features. They just drop files into folders like they always have.

It was perfect solution for integrating version control for my diverse team of designers(macs), developers(linux) and everyone else(windows).

We have also received ambiguous feedback from an Apple developer program reviewer. With the 2+ weeks waiting period in the queue, developers deserve more detailed responses so they are not waiting with no clue if their next binary submission will appease the inconsistent reviewers.