multjoy

It doesn't.

It just means that they've not gone at a speed sufficiently egregious for a detective to be handed the packet to work out the vehicle's true identity.

I’ve seen the standard of driving in the US. This is not the model you are looking for.

Why? Who are you to say what I can, and cannot, write?

Oh, I entirely agree. It just seems absolutely nuts that the US government (or rather the state governments, because ultimately they'd be dealing with it) cannot attribute a gun to a purchase because they've specifically made it illegal to do so.

When you're dealing with that mindset, no wonder gun control measures as unremarkable as mandatory safes and training are anathema.

Yes, but then you'd have to create a database of gun purchases and that would be illegal.

https://www.thetrace.org/2016/08/atf-non-searchable-database...

OP doesn’t even acknowledge it.

Eliot chose, in 1948, when the Holocaust was common knowledge, to reprint a poem that contains the line:

>On the Rialto once./The rats are underneath the piles. The jew is underneath the lot.

That isn’t a poet following a common zeitgeist, that is a deliberate, provocative act.

That doesn’t make it any better. They also had significant opposition.

He was also a virulent anti-semite

They’re not human, they’re not your friend. They’re a spicy autocomplete.

The LLM has literally no idea which one is better. It cannot think. It does not understand what it is putting on the screen.

In a lot of jurisdictions, the offence isn't drinking while driving, it's having a blood/breath alcohol level above a certain threshold.

The payment networks don’t pay for the cost of chargebacks - that’s borne by the merchant or the card issuer, the network makes money either way.

This is one of those situations where the optimal level of fraud isn’t zero.

That's OK, because nobody's provided anything other than anecdote.

How can "which is the larger number" be an ambiguous question?

Schadenfreude, obviously.

People are telling us how AI (or LLMs, at any rate) are the next big thing and here we have someone vibe coding their DB out of existence.

Lots of 'mays' and 'mights', and I've been running long enough, and know plenty of runners, to know that running ruining joints is a myth put about by the exercise avoiders.

It does not lead to heart damage and it won’t knacker your joints.

It will suck all the time you are doing it, but you physically cannot damage your heart from over exertion.

Universal healthcare is a human right.

Likely an OCG behind them. I wouldn't be surprised to see a defence of exploitation.

They don't work. You may as well use phrenology.

You can rely on the answer a calculator gives you. There's no danger that it will simply be confidently wrong.

A human didn't write it, I'm not reading it.

SteamOS & proton.

Days to write a document, but you think that it'll only take 30-60 minutes to review AI slop that may, or may not, bear any relationship to the truth?

That wasn't the question. The complaint is the poster can't find anything on Google because the results are now so poor, and your response is "but here's some AI generated slop, which may or may not make any sense."

You need reasonable grounds to suspect that someone has committed an offence in order to arrest (plus a necessity).

This has been the case since 1984, the necessity was only added because SOCPA got rid of the distinction between arrestable and non-arrestable offences.

Kyiv

You didn't write it, tell me why I should read it?

Lol, no.

Because it is either laziness, ignorance or AI slop.