1,442 karma · joined September 16, 2011
[0] http://rogerbourland.com/2006/07/31/my-drink-of-choice-a-dry...
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/sqlite-manage...
Had some great times chatting to people all around the world on ICQ. I think I still have a couple of FB friends from that era.
I was bouncing an idea of an IRC like pager app around in my head in the months before I became aware of ICQ (but well after it was already developed).
The simplest argument against this is the casual way your typical garage bands tune. Not everyone is busting out the tuners and dialing up 440 Hz, when the guitar player figures out they're out of tune with the bass they just tune up to wherever they're at. With strings stretçhing, drop D tuning, and tuning down a half step, most bands would have hit the 'magic' 432 Hz every other practice and would have stayed there if it had any special properties. And this isn't just me and my buddies in the garage but musicians of nearly every style, genre, and background around the world. We'd revolt if we found our magic 432 Hz and then some clown brought a keyboard in that was at 440 Hz. This simply doesn't happen.
The 'cymatics' demonstrations are great, even the professors I work for get excited about how these demonstrate standing waves in materials. Unfortunately for the 432 Hz people the wave patterns depend on the vibrating materials. I make music out of vibrating strings, resonating wood and digital beeps and boops instead of square plates of metal (nothing against square plates of metal, I'd use those too). So maybe they should start by making pretty pictures of sand on top of a guitar to have a point with the cymatics. Also, the tuner they keep showing for the notes in their video shows their frequencies sharp or flat. They should at least get their notes right. They're also using a modulated tone with harmonics which introduces all kinds of questions about whether they're trying to prove a point or just make cool patterns with the sand. But really, who cares if it sounds good, right? Seriously, if you like your music 'detuned' to 432, go for it.
I've got a theory that altering familiar music is a great way to get us in different moods. We like remixes, right? So a 432 Hz retune might be just the thing to mellow out to. Likewise, a 448 Hz retune might be just the kick in the ass I need in the morning to get going. So retune all you like.
I do have a technical quibble with the suggested method in Audacity, the resample will do bad things to the high end of the music, all those harmonics and partials and stuff (of course, some feel all that is lost in digital music anyway so YMMV). The Audacity wiki talks about better ways to do frequency shifts. I definitely wouldn't do this to anything that has been digitally compressed at any point, your mp3 folders and itunes collection will lose even more when you start pitch shifting them. Rip the original CDs and mess with the .wav files or get the FLAC files if you're serious about retuning your music collection.
The real way to test their idea would be to blind test a bunch of music you've never heard before, some that has been pitch shifted to a variety of frequencies including 432 Hz and some that is unaltered. Score the music and your emotions after each song and see if there is a pattern to the pitch shifting. Now do this to a bunch of people and see if there are patterns in cultures, age groups, musical preferences, etc.
I'm guessing Google is relying on their existing malware detection and site reporting process to weed out pages that take advantage of this. This approach mostly works for mass spammed links and sites trying to pass on malware but won't work for targetted phishing attacks against all but the savviest of security conscious users.
Compare:
http://myaccount.google.com-securitysettingpage.ml/security/...
in the first screenshot to the screenshot from a Bellingcat journalist:
Edit: Found one of them [3]
[1] https://get.google.com/u/0/albumarchive/11010321236096143315...
[2]https://plus.google.com/110103212360961433158
[3]https://plus.google.com/110103212360961433158/posts/58k5AgTx...
I wouldn't mind seeing similar graphs of CVT cars, where there wouldn't be distinct lines but patterns of typical driving behavior may still be obvious.
https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r12&hw=...
The usual Techempower caveats apply: I have no idea about the implementations or any possible constraints on these, YMMV.
http://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r12&hw=p...
I have no idea how well the implementations are on each of these or how well each platform works within the constraints of this benchmark.
http://sci-hub.cc/10.1007/s12210-015-0403-8
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229759371_Lake_Chek...
Some argument against Cheko being an impact crater, referenced in the above work:
http://www.univie.ac.at/geochemistry/koeberl/publikation_lis...
Data from the Italian team that investigated Cheko:
Edit: Don't miss the link in the article to the slippy map zoomable version at https://www.spacetelescope.org/images/heic1502a/zoomable/
Back around 1990 we had a college lab full of PC XT clones on an early Novell network on 'thinnet' (shared coax cable instead of star topology twisted pair to a switch). Some of the games floating around relied on the original PC's 4.77 MHz clock and ran too quickly on our 'turbo' 10 MHz machines so there was a slowdown utility that generated regular interrupts looping over a NOP to allow the games to run.
I thought it would be a great prank to put this slowdown utility on the boot floppies and AUTOEXEC.BAT of half the machines in the room and watch my classmates scratch their heads over some slow computers. Instead, it messed with the CSMA/CD (collision handling) on the network cards and essentially brought that portion of the network down. I showed up to a very angry network admin who had spent hours troubleshooting network cards and cable before finally finding one of the affected boot floppies. Fortunately (for me) he blamed another group and I escaped the full brunt of his wrath.
Shared medium, wired or wireless, always offers some extra fun.
I do agree though, that the concept of breakfast being important is bunk. Everyone is different and as these IF studies show, no one meal is all that important.
Seriously though, I don't really have an inner voice, unless it is maybe something like this where I'm expressing myself and I read in my voice the thoughts I'm trying to express. I was just trying to image accents as I read and this comment sealed it that yes, I can hear accents and a separate voice when I read something.
I should go do some more, I'm fairly confident in my map skills but I bet there are some assumptions of mine to knock down.
There's more from the creator at http://www.eetimes.com/author.asp?section_id=216&doc_id=1328... including this nice tidbit:
The result is the MCL86, which is basically a 7-instruction, 32-bit micro-sequencer. Some of the micro-sequencer's instructions are specialized so as to allow it to rapidly decode instructions as well as nest function calls. With these seven instructions, I was able to microcode all of the 8086 opcodes in a relatively small number of micro-sequencer clocks.
A video of this running 8088mph would be awesome, they already have a number of videos of this running other stuff on a PC: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9B3TaEUon-araO2j7tp9jg EDIT: There is a video of it runnin 8088 mph that polpo linked!
Solid coverage without the fluff.