It can't be judged equally but then who is responsible for judging it?
818 karma · joined April 8, 2011
It can't be judged equally but then who is responsible for judging it?
But for the sake of argument, why? "Big data" is huge an expected to grow exponentially over the next couple of years. This is just another form of big data.
In Canada, we sing (or used to; been out of school for some time) the national anthem at the start of each day. I think it's the same for most countries.
I wonder how something as explicit as a pledge of allegiance compares to the national anthem in terms of the effect it has on a child's values.
But it's important to post for it to serve the purpose.
Once this thing becomes legal, companies have grounds to organize this as a trade with the NSA. The funny (maybe scary is the right word?) part is that they can legally lie about this because it's with the NSA.
This law could circumvent the breaking of ALL and ANY laws by these companies. After such a law is passed, companies may not have to be accountable to anyone. When questioned, they can lie about it and say the NSA said so.
They don't need to release transparency reports cuz the NSA said so. Any tech company can lie to the Privacy Commissioner cuz the NSA said so. They can do anything cuz the NSA said so.
This is the mother of all loopholes. Good luck, world.
Correction:
These days, the world has one dominant search engine, one dominant social-networking site...
Or am I missing something?
So what can the gov't do if companies don't co-operate? With individuals, there is blackmail and illicit co-ercion. What does the gov't do to corporations worth updwards of 100B to get them to comply?
I think the OP is targeted at programmers en masse. So, if we were to pick majority of embedded programmers and see if their application would benefit directly from an FPGA, I'm fairly certain my previous post would come in to play.
The constitution of one country is being used to govern an infrastructure that powers many more.
At the same time though, I think Obama is looking at a comfortable point where trust is traded off for security. Problem with such points is that they can shift in either direction depending on who is in charge - that's what's scary.
FPGAs look very attractive when you're used to comparing C#/Python/Java/everything to C but that fades away as soon as the complexity in managing code on FPGAs comes to light.
All the points mentioned in the article under "performance"? It's left up to you, the developer, to configure the board in such a way that you can leverage them. And that's before you've written a single line of the business logic.
In theory, FPGAs give you the power to code your business logic as circuits (making it monumentally faster) but in practice, the story is very different. You may want to look at High Frequency Trading - they use FPGAs for stock analysis there.
Such as when 80% of the world's code can be, with accuracy, can be parsed into HDLs.
What's the point of this? Parallax exists on the mobile because a phone IS a 3D object and because it's used for 3D applications.
When is the web used for 3D? The closest we come to 3D on the web is games; and JS games already do this.
Though I've often pondered over the implications, I'm not convinced that not gathering analytics is the solution here. This is not too far from the debate about AK-47 - would it be better if the gun had never been invented? How about nuclear power?
The point is that analytics are the way of the future, the differentiation lies in the purpose for which you leverage them.
So the only way to progress is...how again?
I wonder how they view innovation, startups, and Silicon Valley.