818 karma · joined April 8, 2011
Now that we know what virtual objects are about, we can move to a design scheme that's made for virtual objects.
I inherently don't like the phrase 'Flat Design' - there is so much more to this.
What bothers me is the disconnect between the icons for Safari, Settings, and Compass. They don't mesh with each other.
I want to say it's the nature of the game but that's simply not true, we take pride in being assholes. For Brython, while I was appreciated the amount of work and the complexity that went into it, I was unimpressed by the methodology.
Not saying anything about the lawyers.
"preserving the bridge" only makes sense to an outside observer. It may never be a practical option for the OP. In fact, it may be something that may taint OP's identity for the future in that he/she may always be stereotyped as a doctor. It'll be contested every time he meets someone new. It's nothing short of an identity crisis. It's the loss of freedom to do what he wants.
People like this usually try to live life in accordance with self-defined principles rather than those defined by the social structure. They think different.
One point of contention may be that we, or at least I, have much much more in the way of opportunities in that I can realistically dream of an ambition that my parents did not have access to. It's deceptively understanding of them to be able to not only comprehend this but also support me in it and for this I am thankful.
If you don't have an IP clause in the contract, take the IP with you.
This is the foundation of design (all kinds) and, what I think, the post is about.
It's not just YC, it's founders all over.
Taking care of another living thing can be wondrous for the self in so many ways!
The guys took characterizations of a creative person and applied the norms of traditional hierarchical management to them. It's like when you patch a bug..he patched everything about the creative person without actually looking at the big picture. I cannot believe this is on a normative source like HBR.
Did he hand in his resignation and was asked to reconsider? Did he tell them he wanted more money? Did they find out about the twitter offer from outside sources and arrange for the bump?
How did the semantics play out?!
Anyways, this is right on the money. Finding the problem is an art in itself. It's only once we find the root problem that we can design the holistic solution, otherwise it's a whole bunch of patched held together by desperation and neediness.
Example: if it turns out poverty is related to global warming and for the past decade we've spend resources trying to rid poverty in isolation, we are all sorts of screwed.
This is exactly the job of a Product Designer.
Can I send how many requests I want?, I think you might mean Can I send as many requests as I want? ?
I feel like the author should be given a lesson in rhetoric.