990 karma · joined July 6, 2015
https://twitter.com/ARTICLE19Iran/status/1231895623789576192...
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.167...
And as you said, supersonic drag coefficients are typically larger than subsonic ones, which makes things even worse.
True! I've come to realize that anti-reflective coating is more effective than matte screen.
If it's not clear to you, take a look at immigration policies of Canada and Australia. In the US, only 12% of visas are employment based which are very strict in terms of skills.
Categorically false! Most of immigration to the US is family based; actually about two-third of them.
source: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/05/17/key-facts-a...
The result is a vortex bubble over the flat surface which effectively changes its geometry and aerodynamic behavior. See figure 2-12 in the following link:
In general, you're right but for certain class of problems we absolutely have solutions. Just look up inverse methods whereby the input is a pressure distribution and the output is a shape. This is used often for designing airfoils, ducts, and other simple geometries.
Most people have an intuitive understanding of the Laplace equation. For example lightning usually hits the peak of mountains. The reason is that in solutions of Laplace equations, field gradient is proportional to curvature. In fluid dynamics, this field is called the stream function. The top of airfoil is more curved than the bottom so the stream function gradient is higher on top which results in higher wind speeds over airfoil.
But the second ingredient is the Kutta condition which represents viscosity. If there were no viscosity, there would be no lift. The Kutta condition is applied to the tail (trailing edge) of airfoil. Without Kutta condition, the speed at the trailing edge would be infinity (because of Laplace equations. Speed around sharp corners is inevitably infinite). Viscosity prevents infinite velocities so we apply another condition at the trailing edge to make the air velocity smooth.
It's kind of complicated and I agree that there is no simple explanation to lift, but if you think about it for a little while, it's not that hard to grasp.
Although all those programs were cancelled, both US and Soviets built a bunch of interceptors in the 60s and 70s, notably F-106 Dart and Su-15.
Could you please name the program? AFAIK the 1954 interceptor program [1] was not cancelled, but perhaps you're talking about a different program.
https://www.rcinet.ca/en/2017/07/18/the-arrow-legend-mystery...
Obviously, if my family doesn't need help, I wouldn't try to give them money. But if they were in need, I wouldn't say that it's not my responsibility to help either. I think this is a simple judgement call. The efficiency of the Scandinavian welfare system is besides the point.
I'm afraid if you stick to this principle, you will never have any code ready for review. Using TODO is not an excuse for writing buggy code, but an indication of future improvements and optimizations.