528 karma · joined January 18, 2021
But I thought this might be worth blogifying just for the sake of adding some counter-narrative to the doomerism I see a lot regarding the value of software developers. Feel free to tear it apart :)
So much software also just takes for granted that it should be allowed on the Internet.
Me: I see. Google made an announcment today saying that Bard was now using a fine-tuned version of their "Gemini" model
Bard: That's correct! As of December 6, 2023, I am using a fine-tuned version of Google's Gemini model ...
If you do the rigor on why something really is interesting, publish it.
Would be interesting to see some work stress-testing the ability to convey ill-intent across multiple languages. Accurately conveying ill-intent is safety-critical for the person being threatened.
I will note though that I feel safer getting an occasional bad word than I do having a translator straight up deceive me.
For example, "what the fuck" in English->Spanish is giving "qué diablos" output. Definitely toning down the meaning there.
If someone says something mean to me, I want to know it.
The commercialization aspect might be what bothers me most. The article is full of people hurt when startups got them hooked on a feeling of intimacy and then took that away. Emotional manipulation for profit is nothing new but LLMs might turbocharge that ability.
But IIRC it doesn't offer quite everything full Tailwind does. In general I was frustrated with Fresh for not being up-front about the fact that it is largely built on Preact and Twind, and you must buy into those libraries first.