1,078 karma · joined November 9, 2008
Not true. The game was conducted in "developing countries" as well, and the results seem to be same. I can't locate the references right now, but a little googling might help (Especially I remember the results being mentioned one of the TED talks.)
doesn't it amount to offering kickbacks?
Is it just me or does it really sound like a PR exercise of Uber + his startup?
Unexpected leaps forward in a scientific discipline, especially in medicine, should be met with great skepticism.
Many advances in medicine also seem to have been suppressed by vested interests: E.g., http://www.ted.com/talks/deborah_rhodes
I hope you understand that if you are chronically starving, "freedom (of what?)" is the last thing in your mind. That doesn't mean some people prefer slavery; it might just mean that their current situation is so horrible they are willing to trade their freedom for a mouthful.
Facebook is a closed system. When you send a message to someone on Facebook, you presume that you are adding that message within Facebook. The notification email that Facebook sends to the recipient is just that, a notification generated by the Facebook system. You, the sender of the message is not part of this notification system, though you your action triggered the notification. There is no reason why the sender's IP should be exposed in this flow under normal circumstances.
More transparent government is clearly the desirable. If the outcome of this case can determine that, then the outcome should be in favor of transparent government. If the law of the land doesn't agree, then it's time it's changed; isn't it?
Well that's what it looks like to me trapped under an oppressive government on the other side of the globe, idealizing the freedom of American citizens.