56 karma · joined January 15, 2016
- https://angular2-hn.firebaseapp.com/news/1
- https://hack.ernews.info/
- https://mblur.com/hackernews/
- https://hn.premii.com/
- https://app.hackerwebapp.com/
If you're on Android and prefer Native apps, I highly recommend [Materialistic](
https://github.com/hidroh/materialistic). It's available on both F-Droid and Google Play Store.This product could have easily been FOSS with it's pricing model based exclusively on support/hosting.
Setting up a DigitalOcean droplet or AWS instance would have only added a few dollars and extra minutes to your transfer today. The benefit would be to reduce dependencies on external service that are vital to your core product.
Always remember, when you don't host your code you don't have full control of your code. To me having 100% ownership of your source should be the foundation to any software-driven organization
http://www.abstractstudio.co/ looked real promising but the project died and they never shared source (atleast the last I checked)
However, I wouldn't be suprised if some Adobe dev's had internal Linux ports that they don't share with the public. With the majority of the core app being written in C/C++ and them porting some UI elements to HTML, I can't imagine that much of a barrier to offer a Linux equivalent.
The "market share" argument shouldn't be an accepted reason for them to ignore the platform - although I could see how a tunnel-visioned management team could use it in their narrative. I know too many devs who would gladly ditch their MBP, or instead install a Linux distro on it, if Adobe's product line was available for Linux.
Luckily, there's tools for devs today if you just need to inspect/export design like http://avocode.com.
Better for the shells' builtins to be simple and extendable - rather than be optionated.
I ended up making an electron gtk3 build script for the few apps I prefer to use that choose to go the electron route: https://github.com/nikolowry/electron-gtk3