It also invalidates my logic. Maybe there could be some vector with biannual periodicity.
353 karma · joined January 9, 2013
It also invalidates my logic. Maybe there could be some vector with biannual periodicity.
I'd wonder how much study has been done around the socioeconomic backgrounds of those prominent professors. I'd also be interested how those backgrounds have been shifted as time goes by. It would be also interesting if not much research has been done about it when some of them are supposed to do such a thing.
It's actually the politicians who want the people to have enmity to each other and some people are vulnerable to the propaganda. The existence of the North Korea regime and their history of kidnapping Japanese people also don't help. Much of their economic strength also overlaps, so there's competition as well.
If you still don't understand, think about close European countries. They probably get along just fine, but Brexit happened..
English and Korean are just two languages that would have almost no way of influencing each other directly for a long long time. They evolved independently, and once one is familiar with one language system, learning the other is just... painfully difficult in my experience.
If you see grammar errors in my comment, a Japanese person would very likely show similar mistakes in their English writings.
10x or more people around me went to US. The majority of them are still in the country after a few years.
Such tendency was remarkable to me, given the difficulty of learning English and relative ease of learning Japanese by Koreans.
There is one thing I can't understand from the article: it says a low birth rate as a reason of an increase in migration. Why would a low birth rate lead to more migration? I can understand the unemployment rate as a reason, and SK surely has a serious problem of low birth rate.. but that's for new babies...
I have my own personal hypothesis that some types of ADHD are caused by persistent stress due to sensitive sensory reactions. Also, another hypothesis of mine is that some may just develop similar symptoms with enormous stress factors (e.g. no proper caregiving at early age, or PTSD). Is there any literature that corroborates or disproves such hypothesis?
Eventually too much of such cycle would give way to the increased cost of living. But I see a tendency of more moderation in employee compensation by big companies, which would favor small startups again around the area.
But the amount of exercise is important, and once in a while I need to take some rest, then the same issue hits me again. Maybe I need my own dry textbook..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_histori...
I believe the population growth has contributed to the growth of Silicon valley significantly. There seems some feedback loop between the population growth and the industry growth.
IMO, navigation is a different story. I think navigation is one area where the up-to-date accurate information matters, and it seems Google has advantages in this part, thanks to Waze and its massive geo data. Also, Apple navigation UI really needs some critical improvements, like first-person perspective.
I guess a NYT columnist can say this because click-bait-y titles always help for revenue and Google does not stop giving the ad revenue when news articles are critical of its CEO. This looks like both parties doing their roles well enough.
2) Cupertino is close enough to Stanford and Moffett, which were the two centers of initial Silicon Valley. Morgan Hill and Brentwood are quite far. Still, its population and real estate markets will grow.
3) High price sometimes attracts people by itself.
My guess is there would be more failure cases than success cases, but I don't see many negative stories here and suspect much selection bias here.