1,203 karma · joined November 21, 2025
Western governments have a tendency to try and change their publics rather than be changed by the public. They even have a name for it, "psychological nudging".
Either way these are small change, and thanks to the slow but persistent reduction, many places refuse to accept cash and/or don't even have the facilities to deal with it!
It also seems to be blessed with few natural disasters such as major earthquakes, volcanoes, larger tornadoes etc.
Lenin tried to paint kulaks as bourgeois en lieu of actual target, and had to modify Marxism heavily to make things fit. Stalin certainly managed to industrialise much of the USSR, so fulfilled that end. Yeltsin-Putin Russia has created an actual bourgeois state, maybe allowing a workers' revolution to take place for real next time.
Or sort of. In reality, Marx was not an infallible prophet. He did not anticipate artificial intelligence or its consequences, genetic engineering, broadcast media or a host of other things. History has not followed all of the paths he suggested.
https://time.com/article/2026/09/16/health-benefits-reading-...
The article does have a serious point about farmland. We don't have much decent farmland here and should look at former industrial and mine sites instead (there are many of those in Scotland.)
Scotland has a lot of potential for renewables, but solar is not where I would start.
The problem with Net Zero legislation is that it is often designed in such a way that benefits government and big business. There have been exemptions for private planes and yachts, for example, even though these are highly polluting... While ordinary people can barely afford to heat their homes in winter. The main problem with Miliband is like most politicians (including Farage!!!), he has almost no experience of ordinary life.
Cleve Hill is off Kent, which despite housing has better farmland than anywhere in Scotland overall (and a warmer climate). Scotland is getting higher rainfall (thus far, last two summers have been bad). There isn't really a good analogue to Kent or East Anglia here.
From an agricultural POV, most of the land is upland so unsuitable for crops. As I've said elsewhere, there is a problem with suburban sprawl, particularly between Edinburgh and Glasgow, the Lothians, South West Fife... Housing is gobbling up a lot of better land, although industry and mining has made some areas unsuitable for crops too.
The major crops tend to be barley (rather than wheat) and some oats in the grain side; raspberries and strawberries (often in polytunnels); potatoes and things like beets and swedes (neeps).
The main criticism of solar in Scotland is that we get very short days in summer, on top of the weather. In high summer there is light past ten in the evening sometimes, whereas in winter it can be getting dark not long after four.
Golf courses were definitely a life saver (psychologically anyway) during lockdown for many people.
I have mixed feelings about golf. I have never been able to play myself, but it keeps a lot of people happy, so I see it as an intangible like libraries or public parks. Golf courses are a lot easier on the eye than some alternatives, and function as green lungs in cities, and open spaces where people can exercise. One of my local golf courses has a healthy population of badgers and another has deer on it, so I don't see them as completely destructive. But like I say, it is not my thing, so on that level I feel shut out of it.
I think the main threat to arable land in Scotland right now is actually housing. We tend to build on the best land here, especially in areas such as East Lothian or the lower Clyde. We have miles of bland suburbia now. What some people have termed "slums of the mind".