It's worth noting that the book is incomplete, chapters 5 & 6 are still being written. If I'm able to complete the book in the next day or so I'll post a follow-up.
2,100 karma · joined July 14, 2014
It's worth noting that the book is incomplete, chapters 5 & 6 are still being written. If I'm able to complete the book in the next day or so I'll post a follow-up.
I've often wondered many things about the cleanliness, maintainability and style of such code (this particular system, in fact). It's fun to be able to actually poke through it.
---------- ----------
ɹǝɯɯnS---- ƃuıɹdS----
---------- ----------
---------- ----------
----Winter ------Fall
---------- ----------
While not flip or rotate, it is a single operation: "Align the current season to the bottom""With Google Custom Search, add a search box to your homepage to help people find what they need on your website." (emphasis mine)
Their video also seems to indicate the same thing: https://youtu.be/Qd9z48Bo8ZA
They say you can search "one website or even a specific topic across multiple websites". This is specifying multiple domains, not a full-index search.
POC and updates will be available at this URL after some time has passed to allow patching: https://imagetragick.com/
By the way, the footer says "Copyright Date.now()"
"WebKit’s new policy is to implement experimental features unprefixed"
But Mozilla still plans for experimental features to be prefixed:
"Mozilla supports a number of extensions to CSS that are prefixed with -moz-.
Some of these properties have been included in draft CSS specification for inclusion in the final recommendation, but are still experimental... Once standardized, and the support for the un-prefixed variant added, the prefixed properties are dropped."
Consider Mozilla's perspective... they're trying to refocus on Firefox[1] and immediately after they find a suitable place for Thunderbird[2] they release support for WebKit prefixes while Apple announces dropping the same prefixes. Not only does this mean Mozilla arguably wasted time, it also means they'll have this prefix code as an artifact for some time while it becomes increasingly irrelevant. At the same time, it makes Firefox seem antiquated while the floor falls out from under its user base[3].
1. http://news.softpedia.com/news/mozilla-wants-to-ditch-thunde... 2. http://news.softpedia.com/news/two-foundations-are-willing-t... 3. http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
(Unless you enjoy that sort of thing)
Some people even do it out of curiosity: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11304752
I'm grateful for the information. It's incredibly interesting, but it might come at great expense to the author.
You can Tweet questions @codeascraft
Words to live by.
While the subject can't be trivialized, if someone gains learning momentum (whether by interest or confidence) then this kind of material did a great deal to help them.
I do now! :)
Update: Looks like they're shooting for 7:30am ET/11:30am UTC.
No, but I would probably be less inclined to want them as a housemate (RE: the article). The premise is that the e-mail is all you have to go on, so while it's definitely reading into the details it'd almost certainly be a consideration.
For example, if someone places a low value on communication then it would likely be more difficult to come to reasonable mutual understandings about household protocols (chores/cleaning, respectful practices, etc).
> Do you despise them even more so now that it's a value question and not an intelligence one ?
I wouldn't say I despise (or even dislike) them at all, we'd simply be unlikely best friends.
> Or are they not intelligent enough to pick up the adequate values ?
No
> It also depends on how you pick up on the less grammatically versed or bully them into shame when pointing out their mistakes. Do you do that ?
No
> More importantly: s our grasp of grammar strong enough to make up for the perceived deficiencies of the other interlocutors ?
Even if it is, it can be a terrible experience where one side is doing an incredible amount of work compared to the other. Incorrect homophones can be very difficult and when you combine them with spelling errors and other errata, it's often as bad as a garden path sentence because the message can be legitimate but have changed meaning. Just omit commas for some fun: "Rachael Ray finds inspiration in cooking her family and her dog"
I hated English classes in school, never paid attention. Skipped. Failed. It seemed inconsequential at the time. Gaining access to a BBS was a bit of a culture shock. Computers were fascinating but suddenly my peers cared about spelling, grammar... even punctuation (it happened to be a BBS for a local paper, maybe related). So at 15, I felt out of place and committed to thoroughly learning all of the things I'd skipped in school. Not because of snarky responses, corrections, or others’ expectations but because it impacted my ability to communicate - which I don't particularly enjoy but feel is important. Even now, I'm communicating... but it isn't for the sake of making noise or banging on a keyboard, it's about an idea. We communicate to share thoughts and without that mechanism we wouldn't have shared learning which resulted in anything commonly considered "technology" or "machines" today.
My visceral reaction to grammatical errors is the feeling that the person places less of a value on communicating ideas. It isn't about intelligence, it's about values.
Does anyone else feel this way? Am I just a pedantic, judgmental asshole?