149 karma · joined August 3, 2019
Because being a woman is automatically harder than being a man? I'm a man every day. I want to kill myself every day. Whoop-dee-fucking-do. Who wins? Nobody. Everybody is suffering, yet somehow only women get to have people fight to help them.
The response to my comment is telling. Nobody cares about random guy. He should just suck it up and take it like a man.
On that note, I wish more shooters weren't just Rambo. Some of my favourite battles were ones where it felt like I was part of a larger offensive (I think Call of Duty 1 and 2 did this a lot). Unfortunately, the gaming industry completely ignored that design and went on to make one-man army games instead because of the power fantasy, which I find boring. I want to be part of an army. I want to be part of a war. I want to see dropships fly overhead. Artillery smashing the other side of the ridge. Fellow soldiers being gunned down as we push on an entrenched position.
I do agree though, that we've lost some things (while gaining others). Blizzard is no longer putting out the same kinds of games that put them on the map. A lot of valuable IP's that forged the gaming industry in its early years are forgotten or killed off or have some weird mobile/mobile transaction-ridden game to carry the flame. We'll probably never see another Starcraft. The next Diablo will likely be a huge disappointment. We've lost studios like Westwood or Maxis. We're never getting another Silent Hill. Or another Metal Gear. The list goes on.
And then you have a company like Nintendo that's pretty much doing exactly what they've always been doing, putting out the same kinds of games that made them so beloved (with many improvements and experiments along the way). Or Sony with its laser focus on great single-player experiences without loot boxes and their crazy large number of first-party and second-party studios.
Except when it isn't? Are you telling me SI is used in engineering everywhere in the US? I've heard too many stories (especially accidents) to believe that in any way.
Not that I'm advocating for ads that track and profile you and everything that you do. We should be making an effort to create an infrastructure for ads where they can't track and profile us. That's what Brave is trying to do, and I don't understand why people are against it. Like, how do they expect sites to be financed?
Well, Python does have strong typing. It's just dynamic, not static, and I've seen enough criticism about it to say that it isn't as unimportant as you make it out to be. JavaScript gets a lot of criticism for having dynamic and weak typing. And I think both forms of criticism are valid, though not everybody agrees, which is fine too.
... really? This feels like nothing but unrealistic idealism to me. Wherever we've gone exploring as a species throughout our history, we've left our mark (usually bad). You might dream of a reality where we change nothing at all, but it's just not how things work out in reality. And honestly, leaving a bunch of waste, which is most probably entirely sterilized and cleaner than your kitchen by now, on an uninhabited astral body with no ecosystem or atmosphere, seems a bit less egregious than wiping out local wildlife or cultures.
This is where 'cyber' comes from. It's not "stupid".
That's because the field is still in an exploratory and research phase. Unless you're in an industry where correctness is the most important criteria or involved in research into this stuff, your average programmer isn't going to be using any of this. It's still too early, but that doesn't mean it's a waste of time.
> Were payload restrictions that tight on the return Apollo journeys?
Probably, yes. https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2019/3/22/18236125/ap...