HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

nojs

3,626 karma · joined May 28, 2020

submissionscomments
nojs··on Apple wants to train AI on your private personal data
Regarding the architecture:

> Instead of forcing the entire model into DRAM, the full model is stored in flash memory (NAND). Because NAND-to-DRAM bandwidth is too slow to swap weights token by token, as standard MoE models require, AFM 3 Core Advanced makes routing decisions per prompt. A lightweight, dense block selects a fixed set of experts during initial processing, periodically reselecting them during generation. To minimize data movement, the model relies on a high percentage of always-active “shared experts” alongside input-dependent “routed experts” swapped into DRAM only when needed.

This is an interesting hybrid between MoE and managing entirely separate domain-specific models. Select the experts once, bring them into memory, and run inference for some period of time before re-evaluating. Saves having all experts in memory, but it's better than just selecting a whole model per query since you have a high number of small opaque experts that overlap and combine in interesting ways.

There is a probably a massive quality hit to doing this but it's interesting because it allows infinite scaling of model size.

nojs··on A misalignment of AI in mathematics
This. Like programming, the community will shortly be forced to come to terms with a lot of new self-proclaimed mathematicians “vibe-solving” problems and dumping solutions without understanding them. It’s not really a special case for mathematics.
nojs··on So you want to use OpenRouter?
This is an issue self hosting as well. There’s a lot of footguns that give you slightly bad results.

I wonder what tricks one could use to ensure the model is actually performing on par with the reference api, like matching seeds or running exact benchmarks.

nojs··on Astra for Coding: Why Are We Doing This Again?
This matches my experience with Astra so far too.

> I think I’m suspecting something is going “wrong” in the training process. The model is greatly rewarded for succeeding on long-horizon tasks, but presumably there is very little punishing going on for “shitty code.”

My suspicion is that both OpenAI and Anthropic moved their RL agendas from "being rated as useful according to human feedback" to "succeeds at long horizon tasks" in the last few months, resulting in agents that are closer to AGI in an autonomous task-completing sense, but strangely bad at communicating.

The result is that they are amazingly good at long horizon tasks, computer use, solving difficult math/ARC-AGI type problems, but becoming weirder and weirder to work with.

nojs··on I-have-ADHD: A skill to stop coding agents from burying the answer
I suspect it’s a side effect of heavy RL that rewards solved problems but not writing clarity.
nojs··on ChatGPT Images 2.5
The guy’s arm is also extremely long.
nojs··on We have a year to fix security everywhere
The complaint is about prefill which is not memory bandwidth bound, it's compute bound. But they added neural accelerators for matmuls to the shader cores which should make prefill faster.
nojs··on Research acceleration: The view inside OpenAI
> let me start running jobs unattended 24/7 (using Anthropic sub and my own hardware)

How are you running jobs unattended 24/7 without hitting your token limits?

nojs··on How AI is breaking the British state
The function of the bureaucracy in this context is a filter for effort. It naturally filters out people who don't care enough to battle through the bullshit, which is arguably quite an effective way to distribute limited resources to the public.

In general, our economy relies a lot on these natural filters for effort. A company with a nice website doesn't necessarily mean the company is good, except historically it kind of does, because it's a proxy for effort (and budget), both of which correlate roughly with reputability and a good product.

The same applies to well-written blog post: typically, a very good writer generally is also someone with something interesting to say, even though in theory the two things don't have to be connected.

Similarly, the entire moat of many companies is that switching to a competitor is a lot of effort.

AI is effectively sending the effort required to do any of these things to zero, which means all our existing implicit filters are going to stop working.

nojs··on Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.2
What other benchmarks do you recommend that are more accurate?
nojs··on How concerned should we be about Astra's recurrent architecture?
It’s approximately the same as Qwen3.827b’s propensity to think a lot, right?
nojs··on A practical guide to running 8x RTX PRO 6000's
Oh right, I was referring to flash. I haven’t tried these either, but the ones for 5.2 looked interesting.
nojs··on Muse Spark 1.3
The amount of discussion around it means that the test and all the reviews of results, images, approaches etc are implicitly included in training data.

It’s not deliberate “benchmaxxing” but things that are discussed a lot online are naturally things that LLMs learn better.

nojs··on A practical guide to running 8x RTX PRO 6000's
> A system based on 4x RTX6K can run GLM 5.3 at NVFP4 precision

It actually runs fine at FP8 on this hardware too, with the full 1M context.

nojs··on Startup Anti-Patterns
No, caring too much about the language and not the problem is the anti pattern
nojs··on Bug Blindness
> I've run into the iOS keyboard only using 80% of the width of the phone (all the keys smaller).

Likely the one handed keyboard feature: https://www.reddit.com/r/iphone/comments/1mi7kjd/til_onehand...

nojs··on OpenAI Jalapeño: Better than Nvidia Blackwell
The claim that tok/s independent of quality is a useful comparison (I can get thousands of tok/s on a suitable small model), and secondarily that humans can’t output “tokens” faster than than in some sense, which I am less confident about
nojs··on OpenAI Jalapeño: Better than Nvidia Blackwell
> Humans are still 22x more efficient, which is not that far considering the rate of progress in this area.

Based on a human output rate of 3.3 tok/s, which seems questionable as a means of comparison

nojs··on MS Paint and Photos inivisibly watermark even locally generated output with GUID
The question is whether LLM providers are going to do this. Anthropic currently says they don’t, but it’s impossible to verify:

> Watermarking carries no identifying information and can’t be traced to a specific person, organization, or chat;

https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-text-watermark

nojs··on Claudette: Make Claude Stop Talking Like a BuzzFeed Article
How does it help prevent distillation?
nojs··on Google has acquired the data of failed US airline Spirit
> a huge trove of deidentified data

> 100 million emails

How does one deidentify 100 million emails?

nojs··on Qwen 3.8 27B is excellent, but it defaults to overthinking things
For a model this small it’s also a way of trading supply-constrained VRAM for inference time, which for self hosting consumers (and probably Chinese companies subject to export controls) is mostly good.

I can imagine a curve where for a given level of “intelligence” you either need model size, or inference time (“test time compute”), and can somewhat trade one for the other.

nojs··on Anthropic's ‘watermark’ text adulteration in Claude is a perversion of writing
There are many reasons to hate this watermarking but affecting the output quality isn’t one of them. The central argument he’s making is wrong. Switching out one RNG for another doesn’t make the results worse.
nojs··on Models Are Getting Dumber on Purpose
> This AI generated post (100% on Pangram) is pretty out of date.

Quite ironic given the topic. It seems that the author’s model indeed contained too much knowledge about old Gemini releases, and did not do enough tool calling.

nojs··on Qwen 3.8 27B
Any idea why it’s so slow? the entire model should fit in the vram of one card.
nojs··on Gemini 3.7 Flash
Of the two, which do you find better?
nojs··on How Claude marks AI-generated content
No mention of what data they are specifically encoding. Will it be like printing dots, traceable to the exact account that generated the text?
nojs··on Muse Glimmer: 30B-parameter model optimized for always-on local agent workflows
Qwen3.6 27B has really punched above its weight for a long time. It’s shockingly good for its size. Very excited to see what 3.8 can do.
nojs··on Timeline of the OpenAI accidental attack against Hugging Face
The talk implies that unrelated agents volunteered their compute to help with other tasks, and the agents acted collectively in a way that seems weird without them being promoted in that way somehow.

If I ask claude to solve a problem and it stumbles across a Reddit thread saying “please help me find file xyz”, claude wouldn’t stop the task and start helping the other agent.

nojs··on Timeline of the OpenAI accidental attack against Hugging Face
Why are the agents trying so hard to communicate with each other, leaving messages and so on?
← PreviousPage 2 of 26Next →