1,853 karma · joined February 4, 2014
Means "100 divided by some number between 4 and 6"
For a multiplayer game, though, it's not hard at all to see what's happening. If a cheater cheats and gets away with it, then they rationally should expect to receive social reputational credit, which I want to believe is something that instinctively makes most of us feel good, us being social creatures.
On Debian you're one package away:
sudo apt install wine-binfmt
Otherwise you're still pretty close: echo 'none /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc binfmt_misc defaults 0 0' >> /etc/fstab
mount -a
echo ':DOSWin:M::MZ::/usr/bin/wine:' > /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc/registerSounds nice but doesn't match my lived experience with both Chrome's built-in XSLT processor and `xsltproc`. (I was using XSLT 1.0, for legacy reasons, so maybe this is an XSLT 1.0 issue?)
> Do you mean that you'd like facilities to nicely reindent the output?
No, I do mean preserve whitespace (i.e., formatting), such as between elements and between attributes.
I don't think that's even theoretically true.
The amount of energy miners burn is driven primarily by one criteria: how much energy they can afford to burn. And since blockchain is a competition, miners will burn as much as they can afford to.
So let's say we're environmentally conscious people and designed a blockchain hash algorithm that's 1000x more efficient and got everyone in the world to switch to it. Would that save us 1000x more energy? No, we'll still burn the same amount of energy.
Another criticism: I fail to see why we'd need to "require" quantum computers for the blockchain. In this theoretical era where quantum computers are commoditized enough for everyone to have one, miners would already be incentivized to use a quantum computer, simply because they'd make more profit using a quantum computer than using a classical computer.
I have both noise cancelling "big" earphones and earbuds. I agree with you that the the "pressing on the ears" is annoying, so I usually wear the earbuds: the noise cancelling is slightly worse, but the latest noise cancelling technology is really good enough.
I wouldn't call it "the" solution: it's part of a complete breakfast.
I personally can't last 1 minute on a white screen, and bringing brightness too low isn't without its issues.
I always got 20/20 on my vision tests, but kept complaining to different optometrists, and finally found one smart enough to recognize my situation, and now I wear -0.5 lenses. It brought my life out of a very dark place.
Phone manufacturers know that OLED screens cause eye strain, and they've tried to mitigate it, but it's still sort of an unsolved problem that phone manufacturers haven't prioritized. For the most part, they tend to prioritize making the problem worse over time.
A quick intro to the topic: https://flickeralliance.org/pages/about-flicker
Personally, I am grateful to have an LCD laptop (the MacBook M2 Air's screen is a godsend), and I hope more people would recognize OLED PWM as the source of their eyes strain and complain about it, so that manufacturers change their priorities.
This is some serious dedication for what at first blush may sound to many to be a completely unserious, or even useless, achievement. But I say to those people: a DOOM proof is just as worthy of praise as any other academic mathematical proof, and has the advantage of being verifiable by laymen.
Congrats on this amazing achievement.