1,852 karma · joined October 19, 2021
Why not? How much time and effort have to go in to recognizing shitty behavior (cat calling, brown face, jerking off in front of someone without consent, etc)?
Besides, if they have such a short attention span, they can't cancel anyone -- canceling only works if you keep shunning them for a long period of time.
0: I don't agree with this vernacular, it's just what the kids say.
I see this stat a lot and it leaves me wondering how many people are within, say, 50 cents or 5%[0] of minimum wage. The percent of workers earning minimum wage doesn't seem that useful (and I guess neither would the figures returned for my request).
In any case I'd find hours required to live alone within ~30 minutes of work a more compelling statistic. It adjusts for CoL and represents a reasonable lifestyle to shoot for.
0: not suggesting these are equivalent figures
That's really, really poor. I mean it's good for the Android ecosystem but their biggest competitor is at six+.
edit: replaced "almost twice that number of years" with "six+".
And this is why so much energy is spent convincing you that your vote doesn't matter or that both sides are the same, etc.
I don't really care if the saying will have an impact on them. As far as I'm concerned they're unreachable -- at least I have zero chance of convincing them of anything, especially if I can only talk with them in a hate forum.
I think the folks using this form understand the history of the saying but are deliberately changing it to show they are OK with the bans as long as they are limited to neo-nazis and the like.
Once it moves past these neo-nazi recruitment forums we can start worrying about whether or not it is a slippery slope.
Definitely. That would make it more clear it's about SE and not stupid brain tricks.