1,743 karma · joined January 9, 2021
The better comparison might be conversion rate for those who searched on Walmart.com vs those who searched within ChatGPT. Or maybe that is what they're comparing and I misunderstood?
Of course these systems may eventually break down, but for now they seem to work.
2^63 brackets * 8 bytes/bracket ~= 74 exabytes - just to list all possible combinations!
There are many combinations that are completely unlikely, but even if you could reduce this by 90% (I doubt it) it's still infeasible to even list all the combinations.
Someday, in another 20-30 years, this might be achievable. Somehow I feel like it will be a sad day when that happens. Of course the tournament will probably have expanded to 128 by then making it safely out of reach of computation.
In this case the recipient has already reassured the speaker they can handle their own feelings, but still meets resistance from speakers who are guilty or worried about how they will come across if they are too direct.
Of course APIs and CLIs also exist, but they don't necessarily have feature parity, so more development would be needed. Maybe that's the future though since code generation is so good - use AI to build scaffolding for agent interaction into every product.
Edit: never mind, the report clarifies that without the party expense G&A would have been flat YoY.
I know this is unfair to prospective new community members, but I'm unsure of other good methods to filter out AI bots at scale. Would certainly welcome other ideas.
I wonder how much our understanding of past language is affected by survivorship bias? Most text would have been written by a highly-educated elite, and most of what survives is what we have valued and prized over the centuries.
For instance, this line in the 1800s passage:
> Hunger, that great leveller, makes philosophers of us all, and renders even the meanest dish agreeable.
This definitely sounds like the 1800s to me, but part of that is the romance of the idea expressed. I wonder what Twitter would have been like back then, for instance, especially if the illiterate had speech-to-text.
I think 7 or 8 out of 10 would be a bad look.
I mostly included it because of the absurd question Meta suggested I ask their AI.
I could definitely believe that I used to click on more pictures of girls than boys back in high school and college when I actually used Facebook. But they would have been real pictures of people I was friends with.
To your point, I'm sure if I used the product more, the algorithm would get "better" according to what I engaged with.
I made a page about this myself - Model is 6'2" Wearing Size Medium - https://pilk.website/2/model-is-6-2-wearing-size-medium
I see you mention looking for topographical data at a good resolution. I'll follow that with interest. There are US public datasets (IIRC) at more like 3m or 5m resolution... not bad but not really good enough for golf, especially greenside. I couldn't figure out how to pull that info programmatically in the past, though.
Overall this is super cool work, will be watching for more!