npwr

Not if it is recessive. Example with a recessive "gay gene": Both parent have one normal allele and one "gay" allele. The repartition of the offspring will be:

- 25% both normal alleles (normal phenotype) - 50% one normal allele (normal phenotype) - 25% both gay alleles (gay phenotype)

But homosexuality is not a gene. I believe that the [fetal androgen exposure theory](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prenatal_hormones_and_sexual_o...) is the one currently preferred.

> these rules have curtailed individual liberty for the benefit of the whole group.

This is certainly varying over countries and debatable.

What is the purpose of this website?

On the contrary that would make the possibility that the great filter is the appearance of a cell very unlikely.

That leaves these possible obvious filters: single cell to multicellular life or planetary resources exhaustion.

> Besides clueless commentators on the Internet, who is suggesting depression is simply a matter of 'chemical imbalance'? If that were the case, it wouldn't be brought on by loneliness, and it wouldn't be treated with CBT and talking therapy.

Most of (all?) chemical depression treatments are based on the serotoninergic depression hypothesis that has never been verified. In the recent years more and more arguments come directly against this hypothesis. Yet SSRIs are still the first line of treatment for depressive patients.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_depressive_disorder#Path...

What risk would that be ?

Their privacy policy is a ambiguous mess: https://kgbase.com/pages/terms#privacy

Nevermind, I'll program it myself.

What kinds of weapons do you foresee being feasible with this technology ?

Finally a tangible publication on the matter! I was astounded by Michael Levin's presentation at NeurIPS in 2018. I did not understand was no press outlet mentionned it.

This is a breakthrough discovery that will enable the creation of whole new classes of technology and medicine!