899 karma · joined May 4, 2018
> TIPS principal is adjusted by changes in the consumer price index, either up or down. The interest rate is determined at issue.
https://www.thebalance.com/comparing-tips-to-i-bonds-2388668
Any good?
The NYC number is 40%, according to the NYT. But close enough and here are some nice maps breaking my down why those buildings couldn’t go up today.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/05/19/upshot/forty-...
https://www.longtermtrends.net/home-price-median-annual-inco...
Meaning?
What do you mean by quasi optimal?
Genetic algorithms product quasi optimal results but simulated annealing will not?
What evidence supports this claim?
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/02/06/how-highly-...
https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2013/12/30/publics-view...
Catholics seem almost the same as the US population overall to believe in evolution. Evangelicals tend to express the opinion that humans have existed in the same form forever.
Regardless, it’s incorrect logic to point out that there are other oversimplified posts in the thread and justification. Just because someone did something bad, doesn’t invite us to do more of the same.
Maybe edge cause is the wrong word. It’s plainly obvious. No one read the OP and thought: I wonder about 3 year olds driving cars!
Of course, safety and exploration exist along a continuum. It’s good to let kids learn. It’s good to protect kids. So far, the thread has shed no light on the nuance. One poster has expressed an unjustified preference for kids learning their own limits and another has added the pointless rejoinder — “not 3 year olds in cars!”
On the other hand, it did seem to oversimplify and intentionally misinterpret the comment for the purpose of a shallow gag or unimportant edge case.
It would be great if HN was a place for deeper commentary. There are other places on the Internet for the caliber of commentary that fits in the duration of a session of potty training. It would probably be better if we worked to maintain some of what made HN different: substantial comments based around ideas without sarcasm or insults.
Just one poster’s opinion…
Additionally, there is a “This is my architecture” series on YouTube where AWS interviews users.
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhr1KZpdzukdeX8mQ2qO73bg6...
https://aws.amazon.com/architecture/this-is-my-architecture/
Startup companies on the other hand can demand more.
But is she a cultural fit? Does he have the energy? A bit too senior?
I imagine it plays out like that too much the same effect.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/kotaku.com/how-elmo-ruined-sesa...
It seems the right parallel to evolution might include predecessor inventions in vision, computation, and beyond.
Maybe offer all users a free month as way of apology?
What do the need to do to the software to “residualize” it? If that’s even the right expression.
On the ice cream, I was referring to this catchy tune and Apple advertising:
Enjoy!
As for the Iraq sanctions, she was asked and famously replied that it was a hard choice but the price was worth it. People may disagree.
To the extent we do not have enough pro social behavior, injecting random kindness encourages more. Showing up and demanding nonsense favors encourages less.
He doesn’t even want these things. May I try on your sunglasses? Can I have a taste of your ice cream?
I guess they set the bar low to encourage the experimenters. “Don’t worry you can ask for anything — ask for a dollar! Borrow their newspaper!”
I would be more open to it if they had done some thinking. What’s something you genuinely need? Go ask for it. But I guess that’s not as simple. This is just street side IRL spam. Can I have those plastic flowers that I don’t want by which I mean can I waste your time with a nonsense game so I fresh content for my blog?
It’s also fundamentally selfish: “ask random strangers to do you favors”
Why not go out into the world and ask if you can do favors? Find a homeless guy or gal. Ask if he wants your shoes. Ask if she needs a dollar. Then you at least anticipate finding people who welcome partition in your psychological experiment.
You don't need the curl -- read_csv works with URLs directly.
The lambda can be replaced by passing parse_dates=[“date”]
Unfortunately, it’s also a lot of work. In this case, you’ve posted an intermediate stage artifact from R. If one of the many Python programmers reading this want to produce a comparable artifact they need to understand or run that code. That alone reduces your likelihood of getting any substantial replies.
Maybe add a link to an image of the resulting plot?
For example,
> “I go out thinking I’m going to get assaulted,” said Ernest Welde, 47, an environmental attorney. “I’ve had my bags stolen by truck drivers. I’ve been physically assaulted. I’ve had to call the police a couple of times.”
>Another man, Eric Eisenberg, had a similar experience across town last year. An Amazon driver and two colleagues noticed Mr. Eisenberg pointing his phone’s camera at their idling truck, knocked him to the ground and held him down, according to a lawsuit Mr. Eisenberg filed in January.