There should be more native 4bit, 1.25bit and likewise models. Those actually work great while making them smaller in comparison. But I guess there is some reason for them being pretty niche.
2,235 karma · joined December 13, 2018
There should be more native 4bit, 1.25bit and likewise models. Those actually work great while making them smaller in comparison. But I guess there is some reason for them being pretty niche.
> To keep things simple, there are no channels, goroutines, closures, or generics.
Sure, slices and multiple return values are nice, but it's not what makes Go good. When people think about Go they usually think about channels and goroutines. YMMV
While I do kind of get what the appeal and target audience is supposed to be, I absolutely don't get why you'd choose a subset and still have it behave differently than the Go counterpart. For me that destroys the whole purpose of the project.
what an odd thing to say for someone whose product is built entirely on exactly that
Just like with Brexit, the majority of UK's population voted (and will keep voting) for this.
drumroll
Because people have been using a lot of emojis before LLMs in text already, and LLMs have been trained on those texts.
This whole "You have emojis in your text, it's LLM!"-trope got boring really fast. Amazing to see (and to think of the implications of) so many people apparently being in emoji-free social bubbles before this, though.
A more fitting title would be "Germany's citizens outfitted half a million balconies with solar panels". The current phrasing makes it sound like it's somehow a thing done by the government, which is not the case. If anything the government is one of the many forces slowing down this progress. And yes, I am aware of things like grid security and stability being a concern. I am not complaining.
This sort of implies that it was cheaper to just go with he extra cash needed than to do a cube with the right dimensions?
But then again it's the Fed, so they probably just printed more money. (Which also costs money, though?)
> describe indiana jones
> looks inside
> gets indiana jones
Okay, so the network does exactly what I would expect? If anything you could argue the network is bad because it doesn't recognize your prompt and gives you something else (original? whatever that would mean) instead. But maybe that's just me.
Never before on an article I've felt the vibes of the "I stopped reading there"-meme harder than here.
Amazing. We've gone full circle now. I wonder if this is a problem of generational differences in knowledge transfer ... or rather the lack of it.
That is how (modern) society works already on a global scale. I am not saying it's good, but it's the way things are.