nusl

Quite funny how they phrase this.

"We recently discovered.." then later "..The attacker attempted to blackmail us"

So, I'd wager they had no idea of the breach until the attacker tried to blackmail them.

The demo product on the 'site looks really shoddy. Untidied-up 3D printing for $65?

VPNs aren't anonymous, no, despite people pretending they are. Nonetheless, the findings in this report do highlight some things that make user identification easier than you'd expect it to be.

I'd not throw the report out just due to what you argue here. These findings are valid nonetheless.

The price doesn't seem bad, though this case smells of some sort of greater internal shift that's, at least for me, indicative the Bitwarden is being turned into a profit-machine-at-any-cost rather than providing a good service for money.

This new CEO is a massive red flag. Literally nothing about anything relevant to the product or industry, though he's apparently good at private equity and selling orgs.

Probably worth jumping ship now before it mutates into another shitty corporate org, except this one is keeping your passwords.

Seniors aren't layoff-proof, yeah, or anyone really.

I think the point I made in the article is more aimed at AI advancing into being able to do the jobs that people currently say they won't/can't do.

When ChatGPT appeared, not long ago, people said that it wouldn't be able to code well because it lacks the reasoning ability. Well, here we are.

Changed back or not, this demonstrates that they're either willing to make sweeping changes like this that hurt a massive number of users, or that they're incompetent to the point of not realising the impact of the first change. They'd have had to just blindly make the change, since the original PR was approved and merged within the same minute by the original author (no additional eyes, at least that we can see), or ignore user complaints and make it anyway. Both cases demonstrate terrible stewardship of VSCode.

This seems like a very stupid thing to put on the open Internet attached to your name

So it basically says nothing useful other than try to generate hype and make them look good.

Blizzard has become a greedy and insidious org. I genuinely dislike the way they do business and implement systems to keep players playing their games as chores rather than for fun. They charge huge money for trivial things, and their support is entirely useless.

You write awfully similar to the way LLMs do. I can't tell if it's just your writing style or not

Hacker News is turning into every other platform over time it seems. More and more folks just see a headline and comment rather than understand that headlines are designed to mislead you for clicks.

These requirements make sense. They're additional verification steps in place for people trying to publish games for very young users.

This seems like a useful reference when asking AI to create content for you, despite the irony

This article is kinda bogwater. Repeating the same points, writing as if it were LinkedIn, pretending to be technically competent while obviously not. Over and over and over, reiterating the same points but ultimately getting nowhere.

Changing requirements ad-hoc throughout the article, picking and choosing ideal matches rather than objective ones, etc. basically trying to make the data fit the problem by force.

Author, over time, gets more desperate to be "the one that found Satoshi" and loses the plot entirely.

I mean, what the hell is this bullshit?

""" Adam Back: I did a lot of talking though for somebody, I mean … I mean, I’m not saying I’m good with words but I sure did a lot of yakking on these lists actually.

To my ears, it sounded like he was saying that for someone who preferred code over words, he sure had written a lot of words. Implicit in that was an acknowledgment that he had been the one who wrote the quote. In other words, for a few seconds, Mr. Back had let the mask fall and turned into Satoshi. """

Seems to be becoming more common, even for folks that are otherwise quite pleasant to deal with. Perhaps social and workplace pressures causes people to opt for it, much like LinkedIn is a cesspool of bullshit

I'm not a Single-Wombat Entity if that's what you're accusing me of. I do, in-fact, have multiple wombats making up my person.

Log entry: Tried building a wall out of hard drives, but Gate walked around them and kept coming. Walls of information ineffective. I've forgotten my name, so I suspect this may be my final entry.

> "the DEAN threatened to kick me out"

So when did the clickbait title apply? The author is honestly, from this article, quite a horrible person.

It's worth a read, at least the first half, just because it's really fun.

If they did, we wouldn't know. Those that do/did know would be dead.

I suppose this joke only works when you've read it. I should take my meds, else I'll forget.

This article smells so strongly of AI that I'd be surprised if the author did much of any writing.

Why would you modify the original list and return it with the second example? Honestly the first is better

Why don't we train LLMs on the entire internet every day? Then we don't even need to read anything. Reading is something people did in 2025

Perhaps. What happens when we reach the point where slop is indistinguishable from typical human language?

The slop decade will be a slop "rest of humanity." There's no going back from this.

Fair. I suppose what's changed is the breadth/scope

I am actually quite saddened by this. It's very unlikely that' I'll keep using uv, now. I don't trust this kind of shit.

Tried really hard not to smile/laugh while sitting on camera in standup while reading this.