But yeah, I'm kinda over Tailwind. You whipper-snappers think CSS sucks so much; back in my day* we had font tags and tables!
*high school
1,515 karma · joined November 22, 2013
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/oddevan; my proof: https://keybase.io/oddevan/sigs/jUdMqiarv-f7aKiTLRaaC4nwtmlobOZnMjLbNcKVpdo ]
But yeah, I'm kinda over Tailwind. You whipper-snappers think CSS sucks so much; back in my day* we had font tags and tables!
*high school
I try to stay above stuff... but fuck this.
This was like... 1999 to 2005ish, so definitely feeling my "elder millennial" status.
1. WebKit has access to special OS-level APIs that allow it to install and power web apps. 2. The DMA requires support for alternative browser engines with the same abilities as WebKit. 3. It is reasonable to assume this requirement extends to PWAs. 4. By taking away WebKit's ability to power PWAs, all browser engines are now on a level playing field.
_Could_ they have done it differently? Maybe, maybe not: software development always takes longer than you think, and throwing more engineers at a problem doesn't always make it go faster. Do I think they saw another chance to be petulant and took it? Yes.
So yeah, I'm disappointed, but no more here than with the rest of Apple's DMA response.
Basically, if he did something that had a positive effect on the world that also had real consequences for him. Something that actually shows he _means_ it, actually _wants_ the world to be better even if it hurts himself.
If Bezos or Musk or Zuckerberg or Gates(1) did any of that, I'd be thinking differently.
(1) The Gates foundation has done a LOT. Bill Gates is still worth ~$135,000,000,000. A quick search says ending homelessness in the USA would take less than a quarter of that.
EDIT: All that to say, I get it, and for my part I'll try to tone it down. Thanks for listening to this old(er) guy rant.
<?php
use Override;
//...
#[Override]
public function overridenParentFunction(string $stuff) //...The jobs that that people "don't want to work anymore" no longer pay a living wage. Between rent hikes squeezing the low end, high interest rates squeezing the middle class, and every major company from oil down to Kellog's raising prices but not wages, people can't _afford_ to take menial, minimum-wage jobs anymore.
Oh, and a bunch of people died because of COVID, so supply has been affected too.
Nothing is stopping anyone from setting up a competing service and charging for it. The only thing they can't do is provide their _modified_ version as a service without providing the source code. Which is just the GPL's usual distribution clause updated for how modern software is distributed. Bear in mind that said source code could literally be a zip file that is emailed when someone requests; there's no requirement to post it publicly on an ongoing basis.
I don't consider myself a FSF zealot; far from it in fact. Most of my software to date has been permissively licensed. The difference in this particular case is I'm not just building a tool or a library, I'm building out a complete product and putting a LOT of my hard-earned time and energy into it. Enough that I want to actually put in writing that any modifications should also be open-sourced.
I'm not saying the 14 are right and the 1 is wrong. I'm saying that the decision was not based on a statistical model.
I think we might need to be better about communicating this to new users: once something leaves the server, it is out of control.
(I'm working on a project that started as a Tumblr replacement... it's kinda gotten out of control and I'm rapidly trying to get it shippable... ^_^;; https://github.com/smolblog/)
I think the biggest impact, though, is some moderators rely on tools/clients to make their (voluntary) jobs easier. If those tools disappear, then a lot of these subreddits will probably shut down for lack of moderators. And I heard that /r/blind mods literally cannot use the existing Reddit site/apps.