True but we don't need Javascript for it. I think that's what the article is about. We can make cool stuff without or with less Javascript.
1,262 karma · joined November 21, 2012
True but we don't need Javascript for it. I think that's what the article is about. We can make cool stuff without or with less Javascript.
Edit: ah, posting the same link at the same time... But I think the best tip is: be shallow. A lot of things trigger reflow but DOM-depth is causing slow reflows.
For example: DuckDuckGo might hide your search but when you click on a link in the result list the request to that link is still monitored by your Internet provider.
That's also why I think surveillance programs won't catch the real bad guys. Take a look at how long it took to get Osama.
But in the end it's just a job. We all have to make money because we don't grow our own food.
I thought about this a long time and I'm just going to use hacking to make money and spend it on a social project that has nothing to do with hacking and can't be fixed with (computer) hacking.
And the overall look and feel is just Chrome. So I think people will skip Opera 15 and download Chrome instead. Or they will stick to Opera 12 like I will.
Strange. The new mobile versions doesn't get a lot of positive reviews and now this one. I hope Opera didn't loose track.
You might be surprised (as I was) but Windows 8 is the most responsive mobile OS I've ever seen. Maybe it's even the best mobile OS at the moment.
You can get a new Nokia Lumia 521 for about $150. A very underestimated phone.
LSD is indeed harmful but not as harmful as you might think.
"Take the following event. A car drives over a bridge, and the bridge collapses. What does the news media focus on? On the car. On the person in the car. Where he came from. Where he planned to go. How he experienced the crash (if he survived). What kind of person he is (was). But – that is all completely irrelevant. What’s relevant? The structural stability of the bridge. That’s the underlying risk that has been lurking and could lurk in other bridges. That is the lesson to be learned from this event."
Also:
"Terrorism is overrated. Chronic stress is underrated. The collapse of Lehman Brothers is overrated. Fiscal irresponsibility is underrated. Astronauts are overrated. Nurses are underrated. Britney Spears is overrated. IPCC reports are underrated. Airplane crashes are overrated. Resistance to antibiotics is underrated."
Does not work: http://www.foobar.com/api?v=2/get?item=1
Does work: http://www.foobar.com/api;v=2/get?item=1Imho version control could be used for deployment but only when you use the release-branch of your project.
And ofcourse NEVER put your config in version-control ;)
In the Netherlands they ask for data about Dutch people via the NSA. Doing it this way they don't officially have direct access to the data so they don't need a warrant for it.
But yes, Microsoft still has a bad name. Maybe they should call it NokiaOs
For example I like a hardcore band but only because they are different from all other hardcore bands. Most programs will estimate I like hardcore but that isn't the case.
I'm not sure but I think I like the music I like because they have this special 'mood' that fits me. And the lyrics are also important for me. Question is: how can we turn this into meta data suitable for matching.
What else is to gain from monitoring loads of targets without obvious security reasons?
I'm not sure why this is a problem. A model is just a representation. Could be one, could be many objects.
I won't be surprised if they already got him.
When they make him disappear the world would scream horror for a week and the week after that nobody will even remember him.
The only thing that matters is usability. And that's where iOS7 fails. Some examples:
On the home screen "Reminders" is barely readable.
Receiving a phone call: You can't read the name.
Messages: white text on a light background: bad for reading.
The weather: barely readable.A lot of people underestimate the amount of storage it would take to store all voice data.
Some facts:
* The Guardian is the only source.
* We don't know how they verified the authenticity of the PPT.
* We don't know anything about Edward Snowden.
* All companies 'involved' never heard of PRISM and also don't know how the NSA does gather user information without a warrant.According to Larry Page Google does not give access to all your data within 5 minutes: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5860313