1,872 karma · joined March 16, 2014
All I can think of reading through all the different perspectives is: "No one can fix you, only you can find the solution to yourself".
I'm just saying this general trend of cancellation and suppressing views that don't fit squarely in the box of "whatever society accepts at the moment" (which by the way changes by the minute) is troubling.
Love or hate JRE's content, I don't think anything good comes from silencing people
Maybe that's an idea
The paper-pushing world created by GDPR and these non-technical bureaucrats is just absurd and only a burden for smaller companies trying to get things done.
So it went like this: closely lost the first game, then quickly won the second game after just 2-3 shots. Kind of interesting as a "self-reflection" tool to notice how you learn but seemingly too easy if the AI resets every time. Maybe it could learn progressively faster for every game you play?
Physically touching your paper bills and feeling the stack grow smaller every time you pay for something is a sure remedy to overspending.
LA alone dedicated close to $1B to fight homelessness in 2021! [1]
[1] https://www.npr.org/2021/04/20/989015659/la-dedicates-1-bill...
Launching a £500K media campaign (with public funds) under the cover up pretense that "UK’s biggest children’s charity and stakeholders have come together to urge social media companies to put children’s safety first" and then swaying people through "'sofa programmes' such as Loose Women and This Morning for broadcast".
If this isn't manufactured consent, I don't know what is. But seeing what happens behind the curtains really makes you wonder: what other "mainstream opinions" were created this way?
If you're looking to up your skills in a new language or just "try" the new activity, then it makes sense that you would quit a few months later: you've acquired what you wanted.
If you wanted to keep going and pursue that activity for longer, I think it's a matter of not making the activity conditional on it "satisfying" you because as someone mentioned in another comment, you'll lose that initial dopamine hit once the activity becomes familiar (or boring): so the solution imo is to actively decide that whether you enjoy it or not, you will do X. And that's just a matter of learning to commit to something.
I used to be all over the place and chase new ideas over existing projects all the time, but it wasn't until I made a decision that OK I'm going to stick with this no matter what (at least for a period of time) that I started finding success. Now I think consistency is 80% of success.
Another thing I find useful to keep going is to find a way to keep getting small "wins" every now and then in the journey: the small wins make you feel like the past time invested was worth it and make my brain eager to continue as it anticipates the next one.
Would be curious to know how many people feel the same way.
Compare that to same-day or next day delivery from Amazon, it's night and day.
I'd rather not dump more tax money into that mess.
EDIT: I find it interesting that 90% of the responding comments in this thread are seemingly against the parent comment's ideas yet all are being heavily downvoted now with practically no answers to justify the downvotes
All employers welcome to post opportunities directly as well!
"Slowing the spread" is not a good enough argument in my opinion. Everyone wants to slow the spread, the only question worth asking is: at what cost?
At what point do you deem something effective and worthy of sacrificing your freedoms for? 1% efficacy "slows the spread". Is that worth it? Where do you draw the line? 20%? 50%?
Life is risky, everything is a gamble, yet somehow with COVID, all nuance has disappeared, life is not worth living until we can be 100% sure that there is no risk at all.
Locking down has tremendous costs whether mental or economic, you just can't compute and make a nice graph of it.