2,459 karma · joined June 26, 2009
meet.hn/city/41.75786995,2.031182036159852/Barcelona
Socials: - github.com/opsb - linkedin.com/in/oliversearlebarnes
In the mean time the note taking apps help with:
Working memory - a page can hold far more information than I can retain in my working memory. Having a bunch of information helps me build a working model without having to retain all the information while I'm building. Spot patterns - by organising information it's easier to spot patterns.
Long term memory - your brain just isn't very good at retaining information long term. Maybe you have a company wide wiki but the act of building your own notes is enough to form some connections in your brain so that when you come back you have far greater familiarity and insight associated with the information.
As I understand gravity warps spacetime which seems to imply that the masses of all objects in the neighbourhood would be taken into account because they all exert a warping effect on the same spacetime. Could somebody clarify what the difference is that they’re referring to? (or possibly the error in my understanding)
> Ambiguous functions argument positions
It just seems to be advocating for named arguments, something which the majority of languages (OO or FP) support these days. You could say that requiring named parameters is a feature but it's hard to get excited about.
> Not Intellisense friendly
I use Elm and Elixir, both of which have decent autocomplete in vscode (and I believe many other editors).
Critique aside I definitely applaud more towards increasing FP adoption. I think Elm has brought many good ideas to the table already (though admittedly it's bias is more towards ideal than practical). On the flip side Elixir is very pragmatic and easy to get going with for developers coming from OO languages.