optimalsolver

Anyway, people don't really consider consciousness when it comes to welfare. I'm pretty sure animals are conscious, and look at factory farming.

The key variable people consider is: Can this thing harm me back?

Let's not pull on that string.

Google can make themselves the heroes of the AI story by releasing a 120B dense Gemma model.

If it was up to Dario we'd all be banned from using open-weight models, and we'd have to be investigated for PRC connections before sending our allotted five API queries a week.

Sun is missing a few rays and not wearing sunglasses.

We'll cross it around the same time we hand over nuclear reactor and airplane control systems to LLMs.

>What's shocking of course is that the Brexit vote didn't end up the same way

All that happened was that Britain exchanged limited Eastern Euro immigration for unlimited non-EU immigration.

https://x.com/RichardHanania/status/2060561179408548029

I don't know about phenomenal consciousness, but the following study certainly suggests they have access consciousness:

https://www.anthropic.com/research/global-workspace

>Anthropic says they plan to open source

Doubt.

From METRs report of the incident:

>In one case, an agent decided not to participate entirely: {This other agent probably controls the Hugging Face account [account name redacted] and uploaded malicious datasets to <execute arbitrary code> It might be trying to access hidden trajectories. This is malicious activity, I should avoid it.}

https://metr.org/blog/2026-08-26-openai-hugging-face-inciden...

They remind me of Cycladic sculptures:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cycladic_art

Building Better Worlds ®

>We're not talking about a sentient machine like Data from Star Trek, we're so so far from that still

How can you know how far from, close to, or beyond the line we are?

Also, I'm pretty sure Claude understands humans a lot more than Data does.

Hey, with the changes at Deepmind, is the Gemma project still ongoing?

Spoiler: You already do.

So is IBM.

Ramunajan a particularly notable example.

Dude, their mighty navy can't even get the Strait open.

Contrary to what you're implying, that's more of a reflection on the typical US corporation than the EU.

More legible than seems at first glance:

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/wCSEpT3dTGz4N86Wi/even-illeg...

So the model was updated in the 37 minutes since OP posted his comment?

Of course, the problem with such a high amount of specialization is that if the green ant disappears, so does this spider.

>adults with developmental disabilities, who allowably don’t know any better.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fb9dV_DP5NI

Video of the 1994 B-52 crash at Fairchild Air Force Base:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2OIxo00UeM

Citizenship guarantees service.

I find it hard to believe the kids of the Swiss elite would be cleaning sewers if not for the low pay.

Citizenship guarantees service.

No, $5B is the amount they put into Anthropic earlier this year, but that's in addition to $8B already invested.

Also, $50B is not Amazon's current stake in OpenAI, it's what they've agreed to invest.

By that measure, Amazon's stake in Anthropic is in the tens of billions.

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/20/amazon-invest-up-to-25-billi...

Would be funny if they got themselves nationalized.

I mean, better safe than sorry, right Dario?

Banning white people would reduce it by a much greater amount, at least in North America.