otabdeveloper4

When your software crashes and doesn't do what it's told I will think back on the thousands of bullshit tests Claude wrote and feel less bummed out about it. (Maybe.)

I will "tend to" send patches or money. We'll see how the belt-and-suspenders vibe goes.

> Claude Code can build that application in an unprecedentedly short period

Yes, with the caveat that the application doesn't actually work.

P.S. If you wrote non-working applications even before the age of AI, then this is an upgrade, I guess.

> erm, Claude, do it again but leave out the bad stuff and make it good this time, mmkay?

Works for China and Russia. Skill issue.

> or they will implode financially

They are too big to implode.

> The documentation is perfectly comprehensible

That's, like, a stunningly low bar for documentation. "The vehicle is perfectly capable of performing motion, why are you complaining?"

> tend to

Whew, thanks for putting my fears at rest. You're only pwned some of the time, not always.

Rock and metal bangers are all in minor, and they're certainly not "sad".

Yes, modern art is literal trash with no redeemable qualities.

"Complex systems" and "emergent properties" are two absolutely different concepts that are absolutely not related in any way.

"Complex systems" are unstable systems that cannot be solved with simple equations. They do not magically take on properties that they didn't have before.

> I definitely agree that the argument of them being just a probabilistic word matching engine can also be applied to our own brains lol.

You can apply anything you want. You can also apply the argument that our owns brains are just a block of cheese too, if you want. (Nobody will stop you.)

There's no such thing as "emergent properties". The phrase is just a technobabble way of framing primitive animist superstition.

Less than 12 months apparently.

> is battle tested in mission critical systems for years

And still crashes and corrupts filesystems all the time.

(I have one server platform where just doing `insmod btrfs` immediately locks up the server, hard, without even any kernel panic or log message.)

> That still requires trust stores to be distributed to the clients

There's no such thing as a "trust store" in practice. To be "trusted" you just need to demonstrate you have control over a DNS TXT record, and we don't need a special "store" or intermediary for that.

Certificate authorities are an artifact of a bygone time and an entirely different model of internet infrastructure.

Correct, we only need zero.

What's wild is that these AI-psychosis people will be running with the "no end in sight" and "exponential improvements" take for years and even decades to come. Even as LLM technology goes through an economic bust and stagnation.

It's like a doomsday cult in reverse.

No, version pinning is a lockfile that has verified hashes of git revisions.

AI isn't making math discoveries. It's generating a metric shitload of syllogism slop, whuch may or may not correspond to reality. We will probably never know, because really who has time for this bullshit?

> cyber-capable

Ou-la-la. Spicy. But actually we already have those kinds of AI.

> You can pin versions.

You can, but you won't. Let's be real for a second now - the only reason you use this feature is because you can't be bothered to use a real package manager that pins versions.

> and which directly pulls in any dependency and exploit

Fix't it for ya.

> advancements

They're not advancements yet. At this point they're just LLM hallucinations that may or may not be advancements.

> refuse to engage with breakthrough results

These aren't results yet. They're potential results, but to find out we'd have to get a human mathematician to sift through a metric shitload of LLM hallucinations to see if there's a nugget of truth somewhere in there.

NixOS is the perfect homelab solution. You don't really want an overengineered VM monstrocity - that stuff is only needed to work around coporate process insanities.

There's a devkit for all of Korg's stuff too.

I wonder what specifically allowed this. Is it some new LLM innovation that can do reverse engineering now?

M-Vave didn't release any source code.

> AI math is happening and there's no going back

"Math" is about uncovering the epistemological foundations of the universe.

Adding AI here does nothing and is probably a regression in that it diverts resources from actual "math" into some sort of LLM wankery that nobody wants.

I'm guessing you can fix this with some prompt engineering.