I can understand being frustrated by that question. Reporters for a chess championship should be more understanding of what it's like to play a tough match.
165 karma · joined August 7, 2013
I can understand being frustrated by that question. Reporters for a chess championship should be more understanding of what it's like to play a tough match.
The Microsoft Store on the other hand.... that needs work. I've been a few times now and the balance of staff:customers:devices was way off. As one of the few customers in the store, I was repeatedly asked if I had questions. Finally I decided to ask what QuadHD+ is (3200x1800 if you're curious)... the store rep didn't know, then dragged me over the computer so she could look it up and "explain" it to me and how it's "better than retina".
My understanding of the process is that code is written in a language that must be compiled. After it is compiled, it is then "packaged" into an installer file, whose internals cannot be examined. After it is installed, it then consists of a directory full of files which help run the program, but these can still not be examined.
Is it true that the code cannot be seen at all these stages? No way to reverse engineer it?
And by open sourcing, an experienced person could see ways to break the code by causing infinite loops, creating false helper files, using a fake "mp3" file, etc?
I shop at WinCo in the PacNW and $3/lb would be pretty standard for pork chops when buying a ~2-3 lb package.
I see that you're talking local grocer, but I assume their pricing wouldn't be that drastically different to a major chain.
What would it take to trick Grandma into giving a person/program access to her Bitcoin wallet?
I assume she would just need to reveal her password to a program and from there it could steal her wallet?
The idea of grocery stores having permanent loss-leading items never occurred to me.
I know these practices wouldn't apply too well when you're making a PS4 with a single performance level, but that 60% yield still sounds horrible from a process design perspective.
Perhaps not the most appropriate choice of words
I've seen a good number of articles about wallets being stolen or exchanges being compromised but I don't know enough to tell if it's negligent behavior by the user/owner.
Additionally, the justness of military conflicts these days is far more questionable than in the past. Doesn't this make it reasonable to be more critical of the military as a whole?
They didn't turn it down.
Specifically I'd prefer open source JavaScript.
"the rate at which technology increases our productive capacity is probably polynomial, rather than linear. So we should expect to see ever-increasing variation in individual productivity as time goes on."
Then maybe at that later time their internal generosity dries after years of toiling and smaller than expected payback.
======
How do we balance this? What if an organization employs non-technical people that pay 3x as much as necessary for tech services because they don't understand what's necessary.
I guess if we're gonna be retroactive, though, there are tons of people who should be named.
It's probably the most artsy personal page I've seen.
And isn't a good amount of the internet infrastructure guarded by conduit? Literally making it a series of tubes...
I'm wondering about the amount of work it would take to clean up the room after each guest, and whether that would outweigh the profit.
I've also wondered about downvoting... I never see a button for that, but it seems like some people are still able to. Is it just the 'flag'?
And an aside- does pg have the most karma of any HN user?