Here [1] is a link from the Financial Times that talks about the hypothesis you mention, where a combination of a lull in the wind and the bank effect pushed the bow of the ship away from the bank while pulling the stern in.
1,391 karma · joined November 20, 2013
Here [1] is a link from the Financial Times that talks about the hypothesis you mention, where a combination of a lull in the wind and the bank effect pushed the bow of the ship away from the bank while pulling the stern in.
Apparently the wind was coming from the east, so it was more likely the opposite, a lull.
The ship was oversteering to the left the whole time because of the strong wind. When there was a sudden lull in the wind it got too close to the left side. The bank effect might have then pushed the bow away and pulled the stern in, resulting in the ship getting wedged.
[1] has a good description of the situation and the bank effect.
Hungary is a little ahead, as they are also using the Russian vaccine. But still behind the US.
Almost, but not quiet. As of 3/21 Britain has done 44 doses per 100 people.
Israel is leading with 112, followed by United Arab Emirates with 74 and Chile with 44.31. These countries are all smaller than Britain though, as you point out. No country as big or bigger than Britain is doing it faster.
For comparison, the US has done 37 per 100, while most of the EU countries are between 12-13. Hungary is at 21, because they have not only used the EU provided vaccines, but also using the Russian vaccine.
What do you do on an iOS device? Does a full device reset reinstall the OS, or does it simply remove all user settings?
I feel like the locked down nature of iOS makes it harder to attack, but if an attack goes thru it would also make it harder to clean up the attack?
They never had the domain.
The parent post of the parent post.
Compare that to the US where they lay people off in a down turn, only to then have to rehire and retrain once the economy picks up again.
I’ve used Apple Maps way more often just because I can’t see the google maps logo.
That’s an oft repeated myth, but it’s not quite true.
From an article by the EFF:
> The circumstances under which a company could actually lose a trademark—such as abandonment and genericide—are quite limited. Genericide […] is very rare […]. Courts also set a very high bar to show abandonment (usually years of total non-use). Importantly, failure to enforce a mark against every potential infringer does not show abandonment.
[1] https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/11/trademark-law-does-not...
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25807199
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25886601
Two articles about the discovery:
https://www.npr.org/2016/07/16/485696248/a-chemist-accidenta...
https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2018-quest-for-billion-do...
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25807199
Two articles about the discovery:
https://www.npr.org/2016/07/16/485696248/a-chemist-accidenta...
https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2018-quest-for-billion-do...
https://www.npr.org/2016/07/16/485696248/a-chemist-accidenta...
https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2018-quest-for-billion-do...
One would think so, if normal rules applied. But it is hard to see how the US would allow Boeing to not weather this, or any other event.
For defense reasons alone it seems unlikely they would ever allow Boeing to fail.
I feel like this is the more important of the two points you made.
Even without Uranium, it's conceivable to have a second industrial revolution. We don't need nuclear power for that.
But without easily accessible fossil fuels, it's much harder to envision the next civilization having an industrial revolution. They might indeed never rise to our level of technology again.
(And that's after I realized that they will eventually open. Originally I rebooted the machine before any app had had a chance to open.)
From an article by the EFF:
> The circumstances under which a company could actually lose a trademark—such as abandonment and genericide—are quite limited. Genericide […] is very rare […]. Courts also set a very high bar to show abandonment (usually years of total non-use). Importantly, failure to enforce a mark against every potential infringer does not show abandonment.
[1] https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/11/trademark-law-does-not...
I suppose they could’ve done it with a little less ‘ultimatum’, but it looks like they _did_ reach out before unleashing anything else.
> Yesterday I had a lot of retweets and reddit posts and such for playing Doom on a pregnancy test.
> But as I explained then, it wasn't really PLAYING on a pregnancy test, it was just a video being played back, not an interactive game.
> Well, now it is. It's Pregnancy Test Doom!
It’s been many years since I read it, but I recall it being a very interesting read.
More startups on the list use Ruby than any other language, and it accounts for over fifty percent of the valuation. It was very popular with startups ten, twelve years ago, but may since have slipped?
On the other hand among younger companions es one might expect to see more Go, Node and maybe Rust?
Still, an interesting analysis.