676 karma · joined March 6, 2018
And some people said we didn't need em.
Dred Scott v. Sandford
Long history here of bad judicial decisions
Maybe it was only popular because it was the only game in town 30 years ago, and the auto-renew subs for doctor and dentist's offices stopped when those doctors and dentist's retired.
Maybe an ai that was trained to be a cherry gen z persona?
Or maybe there's a clue hidden there.
How would they pay for it? It's set up the way it is for a reason.
The prison one is one that never gets enough focus, mainly because we have an attitude of writing off people that go to jail and that whatever happens to them there a rough form of justice. But then it's not really great to have people sentenced to life in prison without a chance of parole now performing this kind of "justice" to other people that might have a chance to reform and go back into society.
Just as a single example, Freddy Geas was a mafia hitman who was sentenced to life in prison. He killed Whitey Bulger, another murderer. Sure, Whitey wasn't innocent, but did he deserve to be beat to death by another murderer under state care?
Also, putting remorseless killers in prison also represents a threat to other prisoners. We haven't figured out how to prevent that yet.
Should capital punishment be more strictly controlled with a massively high barrier to use, yes, but there are solid reasons to use it.
The chief thing to understand about the MBTA (and many other things about metro Boston), is it's a patronage system at heart. Jobs to friends, and jobs to allies. That's it. Stripping the system and the public in order to pay for nice homes on the Cape, and to pay for nice retirements in NH and Maine.