779 karma · joined January 1, 2010
I think it's time for killing the "Berlin is dead cheap" myth
TeX distributions are getting more complex and much bigger, while at the same time providing a _much_ better user experience than a few years ago. TeX live for example has the "full" distribution scheme as default and the users always never have to install things found somewhere on the net by themselves. It just works for most people around us.
As soon as you start splitting things up, it's hard for the users to follow.
"We" keep getting questions from Linux users that "package X is not available and how can I install it? I've tried [many horrible things]?" The answer is usually "install package texlive-something" of your distro. For these users the user experience is worse than installing the full texlive.
One really nice thing is with current texlive (> 2011) is that you can get updates between release cycles. This also makes (IMO) the user experience much better but is in contradiction to what most distros need.
Edit: in the hope of good css/html5 conformance / no browser specific programming like in the old days
"The road to wisdom? Well its plain and simple to express - err and err and err again. But less and less and less" (Piet Hein)
* LaTeX is working on the iPad, see for example: http://meeting.contextgarden.net/2010/talks/2010-09-14-arthu...
* LuaTeX (http://luatex.org) is written in C, not WEB.
* You only need one binary to work with TeX. Either PDFTeX or LuaTeX. All other binaries are just glue code (for example to generate missing Metafont fonts, but who wants them these days anyway?