1,008 karma · joined October 3, 2018
But the euro itself has climbed ~10% YTD vs the dollar (≈ $1.02 → $1.12-1.18). So you get an ~18% gain if you invest in MSCI Europe in dollars.
Europe hasn't "beaten" US stocks because its companies suddenly out-executed; most of the gap is the stronger euro.
Not that it matters who’s "winning." My gripe is with US headlines that shout "Japan stocks are on fire" or "Europe stocks are on fire," when what’s really happening is that global markets are rising together and currency swings make one region look better than another.
But I think any weakness is temporary. With a stable government and abundant natural resources that will be even more sought-after in an AI-driven world and largely insulated from automation Australia’s long-term prospects look strong.
Ask yourself, did you panic during these years? Mostly no. These were pretty good years.
Always check both local currency and USD returns when evaluating international markets.
This sounds like the sycophant version OpenAI retracted. https://openai.com/index/sycophancy-in-gpt-4o/
I do not follow your point on privacy. AFAIK all tokens that perplexity sends to the foundation model APIs are stored by those companies. For example OpenAI is under court order to store everything. Is your point that because perplexity can trim off the metadata of who their customer is, the body of the content is harder to identify?
That said, I think there’s value in a catch-all fallback: running a prompt without all the usual rules or assumptions.
Sometimes, a simple prompt on the latest model just works—and often in surprisingly more effective ways than one with a complex prompt.
Waymo is clearly growing fast, but it's not bigger than Uber—yet. Super impressive its already surpassed Lyft. From personal experience, it also seems to have driven Uber prices down materially.
Page 6: https://www.bondcap.com/report/pdf/Trends_Artificial_Intelli...
Page 302: https://www.bondcap.com/report/pdf/Trends_Artificial_Intelli...
But let's be honest - most of these people, the ones the article is taking about, where they think they are some messiah, would have just latched onto some pre-internet cult regardless. Where sycophancy and love bombing was perfected. Though I do see the problem of AI assistants being much more accessible, so likely many more drawn in.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love_bombing.
I was mainly referencing my own experience. I remember locking myself in my room on IRC, writing shell scripts, and playing StarCraft for days on end. Meanwhile, parents and news anchors were losing their minds, convinced the internet and Marilyn Manson were turning us all into devil-worshipping zombies.
2. OpenAI has admitted that GPT‑4o showed “sycophancy” traits and has since rolled them back (see https://openai.com/index/sycophancy-in-gpt-4o/).
Here, his signal comms are likely top secret and we would have no way of knowing if his office followed the legally allowed step of forwarding after the fact for many years.
The thing I am more bothered by is why would he take a picture of his desk, thereby narrowing the attack profile.
Question for you as a sailor in a lighter boat. If alerted, would you be able to change direction fast enough?
Also, I’m guessing at some point the collision is extremely dangerous for the boat not the whale.
Meaning the technology, if feasible, might have a market but just to a different buyer than large commercial vessels) (sail boats, yachts, speed boats).
There is no clear winner. The pace is fast.