2,447 karma · joined April 10, 2012
Writing code and delivering a feature are not synonymous. The time spent writing code is often significantly less than the time spent clarifying requirements, designing the solution, adjusting the software architecture as necessary, testing, documenting, and releasing. That effort won't be driven to 0 even if an LLM could be trusted to write perfect code that didn't need human review.
/s
Sexprs sitting over here, hoping for some love.
No, you shouldn't. They hate that.
"Writing is nature’s way of letting you know how sloppy your thinking is." -- Guindon
Hey, hey, hold on there Einstein. Enough with the technical jargon!
> He said, if you tell someone you’re a journalist they’re going to believe you. Your job is to honor their trust.
Sadly, that is no longer true. Today's "journalists" far too often see their job as proselytizing rather than reporting.
Every time someone says "LLMs are good at boilerplate" my immediate response is "Why haven't you abstracted away the boilerplate?"
Design documents are so essential that even after mumble years in the industry, I am amazed when people, including putative "Product Managers" push back on the idea. As Leslie Lamport noted, "Writing is nature's way of telling us how sloppy our thinking is."
For those wanting to learn how to improve the quality of their technical writing, see Write Like an Amazonian: https://medium.com/@apappascs/write-like-an-amazonian-14-tip...