1,284 karma · joined February 6, 2012
That being said I would keep very close attention to reviews. (I use appfigures to keep track of that) and fix very quickly everything that should not be. Even though we were #2 there were a few bugs reported via the review system and there is a lot of people that are kind enough to let you know,
If you have a tool like crashalytics thats even better.
Congratulations!
Those are not the only criteria for selection, but its the most decisive. We assign "points" to the different criteria and then rank the next best song according to that index.
I followed every consideration in the official AdSense blog, ensured that every content policy was met. Appealed with a strong case and got revoked.
No official explanation was given even by Google employees I contacted.
I see tons of sites with shit content and link building monetize with adsense while ours is loved by 1,000,000 users who spend 12 minutes average and a bounce rate below 6%.
Everything on the leak makes total sense to me and we spent so many days implementing stuff to get Google's approval (like image fingerprinting, spam database, porn detection, overseas moderators) to get a shitty robot response with no real explanation.
It might not be the case, though. Music produced my the RIAA labels have always been more popular, thats why they are commercialy successful, thus advertised, and with more possibility to be 'recommended'
But why independent musicians feeding the old monster? There are lots of really good music services without RIAA people involved. (i might be wrong on this) rdio, tunein, grooveshark, tunecore, last.fm, beatport
Today music services are the equivalent record stores. some of them have lots of RIAA produced pop music, some others will get only independent labels.