7,416 karma · joined October 23, 2009
Email: charles@codemix.com
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Projects/Sp...
Good job for shipping, but it's not ready for public consumption yet without those things imho.
The other strategy is physical and mental exhaustion, for this I recommend starting a business and/or becoming a parent.
Why do you assume that your attention is so valuable that developers should go out of their way to cater specifically to you? The number of people who disable JS is statistically insignificant.
You have chosen to break your web experience, you have no one to blame but yourself.
Another problem is that they never solve the impedance mismatch, idiomatic JS does not map cleanly to idiomatic ObjC, you end up with code that is idiomatic in neither.
some clichés apply here:
"You can write fortran in any language"
"There are no silver bullets"
I think the same arguments that people have against CoffeeScript apply here - it's not possible to use CoffeeScript without knowing JavaScript, and in this case it's not possible to use JavaScript without understanding the Objective-C ecosystem. At this point, this is Objective-C with a different syntax, it's not really JavaScript. Existing documentation, blog posts, stackoverflow answers etc use Objective-C, so the programmer will have to do a lot of translation in their heads. If I have to learn all the Objective-C / Cocoa APIs anyway, what am I gaining by using a different syntax?
var greetings = {world: "Hello World"};
var subject = 'world';
console.log(greetings[subject]);
This is zealotry in action, who do they think is going to use this?